Agnostic Forums
  Show Threads  Show Posts

Agnostic Forums - Discuss Agnosticism

Go Back   Agnostic Forums > Theism -> Agnosticism - > Atheism > What is an Agnostic?

What is an Agnostic? The forum devoted to spreading the understanding over what an agnostic is and what he or she believes in.


ThirtySpace.com
Want These Ads To Go Away? Become A Premium Member. Click here to see how...

Reply
Bookmark this thread at ThreadSoup: BookMark This Thread On ThreadSoup.com! Add it!
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-30-2007, 09:37 PM   #1 (permalink)
Armel P
Senior Member
 
Armel P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 217
Armel P is on a distinguished road
Default What kind of Agnostic are you?

I'm creating this topic to get an idea of the Agnostic demographic in this community. There are those that call themselves Agnostic because they're undecided, those that merely feel the universe is a mysterious place humans can't understand, and those who make decisions based on carefully considered logical conclusions. Within which category do you fall?
__________________
Aspiring Memetic Engineer
Armel P is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2007, 09:00 AM   #2 (permalink)
Og
Campbellite

 
Og's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 2,471
Og has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I do not think that one need be "on the fence" in terms of the idea of an individual entity God in order to be an agnostic. I think it's more than clear, given our understanding of the world, that the idea of a personal god or a god who is an individual entity is false.

As for agnostic, I think the term embodies the scientific method. As sherlock holmes said:

Quote:
Once you eliminate the probable, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
Science is in the business of APPROACHING truth, not attaining it. It chips away at what is not truth in the same way that a sculptor chips away at what is "not" the statue. Science does this chipping with the scientific method. If the idea resists chipping then it's focused in on and people try their best to chip away at it.

Like gold that is melted and scraped and burned in order to purify it.

The process of science is a non-dogmatic self correcting study where we learn what is NOT the truth. What remains, we say, is something like the truth. This is agnosticism to me. It has provided us with our modern understanding of ourselves and the universe. It's given us the tools to actually see and hear the creation event (radio telescopes and the cosmic background radiation). It's given us modern telecommunications and extended lifestyles.

Agnosticism does not mean that the questions are too hard to answer or "the data isn't in." It means that I will build up an understanding of what things are not in order to get myself closer to the truth of what they are.

To me it's not "I don't know if I believe in yaweh/allah." To me it's: "those are false," but I still don't know what it means to exist or even if that question makes any sense in the first place.
__________________
Vi veri veniversum vivus vici. (By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe)
The self is not a fixed entity but a dynamic process of relationships
You & I, no distinction. - Tat Tvam Asi
Become Who You Are
Og is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2007, 12:44 PM   #3 (permalink)
Armel P
Senior Member
 
Armel P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 217
Armel P is on a distinguished road
Default

I agree. I always find myself pointing to the scientific method when arguing with people that call themselves Atheists. If you can test it, you can understand it. Otherwise, it is a non-issue. When you get down to these arguments, however, you find out just how narrow the schism between Atheism and Agnosticism is. And to some degree, it is not expected. There are many people who feel that there is a bigger gap between the two belief systems and those people tend to be either fence-sitters (actually quite rare and shouldn't be considered Agnostic) and people who just say "We don't know" without seeking a deep understanding of that statement.
__________________
Aspiring Memetic Engineer
Armel P is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2007, 12:53 PM   #4 (permalink)
Og
Campbellite

 
Og's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 2,471
Og has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I don't really label myself an agnostic or an atheist.. too much baggage with each word.
__________________
Vi veri veniversum vivus vici. (By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe)
The self is not a fixed entity but a dynamic process of relationships
You & I, no distinction. - Tat Tvam Asi
Become Who You Are
Og is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2007, 01:02 PM   #5 (permalink)
Armel P
Senior Member
 
Armel P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 217
Armel P is on a distinguished road
Default

I don't mind it. It satisfies a very human part of me that enjoys belonging to a group. I'm even hoping to write an Agnostic Manifesto and have already designed a symbol.
__________________
Aspiring Memetic Engineer
Armel P is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2007, 12:50 AM   #6 (permalink)
Astreja
Senior Member
 
Astreja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 403
Astreja is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm a skeptical agnostic theist with a touch of apatheism. I think that gods are possible, but recognize that there is no way for a non-god to verify their credentials. There's also no way to determine the boundaries of reality -- Is this a closed system? If so, what if anything lies beyond?

Then, discarding the above questions as essentially unanswerable, I get back to the business of living my life and enjoy the occasional bursts of mystical activity that sometimes invade my world.
Astreja is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2007, 12:47 PM   #7 (permalink)
Armel P
Senior Member
 
Armel P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 217
Armel P is on a distinguished road
Default

From Guy Maddin territory.
__________________
Aspiring Memetic Engineer
Armel P is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 10:10 PM   #8 (permalink)
zombie2012
Member
 
zombie2012's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Good 'ole Tenessee!
Posts: 38
zombie2012 is on a distinguished road
Default

From what I think about a somewhat believe i cant really say if i'm fully agnostic or not. I mean i'vr read alot about the ancient astronaut theory from sitchin and Will hart and that as changed alot of my views on religion and life. If I said that I believed that we were created by aliens, wouldn't that really make me an atheist?I've read about some of the alien-based religions and i am very interested i them, but they still are "religions", so there is room for manipulation and brainwashing. So all in all I would say that I am just confused.
zombie2012 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2007, 01:30 PM   #9 (permalink)
Piglet
Senior Member
 
Piglet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 108
Piglet is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Armel P View Post
those who make decisions based on carefully considered logical conclusions.
Armel P

And those conclusions are based on 4 decades of rational observation.
+ Many many thousands of work read. [some really good stories]
By a being society says is in the .05% top range, Mr smart guy. [but not really]

Yet it all brings me closer to my ignorance. [is that T S Eliot?]

There can be no 'proof of athiesm'
And any religion that has hell in it is false.

What is left Armel ?

Biding time

Piglet

PS. could you email me the symbol?
I'd like to see it.
nemesis@westnet.com.au
__________________
Vir prudens non contra ventum mingit

Last edited by Piglet : 05-11-2007 at 01:58 PM.
Piglet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2007, 02:33 PM   #10 (permalink)
Armel P
Senior Member
 
Armel P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 217
Armel P is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Piglet View Post
Armel P

And those conclusions are based on 4 decades of rational observation.
+ Many many thousands of work read. [some really good stories]
By a being society says is in the .05% top range, Mr smart guy. [but not really]

Yet it all brings me closer to my ignorance. [is that T S Eliot?]

There can be no 'proof of athiesm'
And any religion that has hell in it is false.

What is left Armel ?

Biding time

Piglet

PS. could you email me the symbol?
I'd like to see it.
nemesis@westnet.com.au

I have to be honest, I can't tell if you are disagreeing with me. But I will say that the logical thinking involved dates back much farther than four decades. It just was not as fashionable as it came to be in the twentieth century. I think there has been an intelligentsia, of small percentage as usual, for hundred of years that understood or would have understood these ideas and it is because of these people that he have such a grasp of the ideas now.

As for the symbol, well I can't do that yet. The symbol is highly dependent on the essay I might write on agnosticism. But this essay will also serve as a learning process for me and I may change my views as a write it. So we'll see. I may even decide that having a symbol is too childish or even that it somehow undermines the ideas. I've always hated symbology and numerology. It is nice and tasteful though.
__________________
Aspiring Memetic Engineer
Armel P is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What kind of god promises sex for servitude? Number 6 Islam 18 02-23-2007 01:19 PM
What kind of debate would there be if taiarain Evolution vs Creationism 10 01-17-2007 02:07 PM


» User Settings
User Name:

Password:

Remember Me?
» Quick Register
User Name:


Password:


Confirm Password


Email


Confirm Email


Check to Agree with forum rules

» Sponsored Links

» Links We Love
HD Wallpapers

PC Tech Forums

Myspace Layouts

Coupons Codes & Bargains

Deaths In Iraq


Take AF With You
Feed Icon   RSS  RSS-1   RSS-2 XML  JS


» Sponsored Links


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright © 2006 - 2007 The Jibber Network. All Rights Reserved.