Agnostic Forums
  Show Threads  Show Posts

Agnostic Forums - Discuss Agnosticism

Go Back   Agnostic Forums > Religion - Theism & Atheism, Agnosticism, Philosophy, Science > Definitions

Definitions What do you mean by: Agnostic, God, Religion, Faith, etc?



Want These Ads To Go Away? Become A Premium Member. Click here to see how...

Reply
Bookmark this thread at ThreadSoup: BookMark This Thread On ThreadSoup.com! Add it!
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-19-2007, 08:29 PM   #101 (permalink)
shadowind
Senior Member
 
shadowind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 353
shadowind is on a distinguished road
Default

my diffinitions
atheism-belief that there is no god(s)
theism-belief in some type of god(s)
agonstic- belief/certainty that god can neither be disproven or proven, neither atheism or theism, agonstic is the middle ground, it claims not to know, for what is beyound our knowledge, when we are truthfull, we must say we do not know. we claim not knowledge of the existance of god, althrough we might lean towards theism or atheism with our fates or other beliefs. others might not lean towards either, others simply don't care, or some combaination.
confused- none of the above, and not knowing where you stand,
shadowind is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 08:47 PM   #102 (permalink)
Vinterland
Senior Member
 
Vinterland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 320
Vinterland is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

My definition of theism is the same. However, it is irrational that atheism is defined as a denial of God/belief there is no God. In fact, by that very definition, atheism is irrational. Being a theist as you defined, is not conditional on level of conviction, but simply belief/faith. The same applies to atheism. I do not have to be convicned like a strong-atheist to be an atheist, I cna simply not believe. Agnosticism is not a middle ground between beliefs; it is a middle ground between convictions. Being that atheism and theism are not necessarily convictions, this reduces agnosticism to a statement about lack of knowledge. I could better explain my beliefs by saying I am a "scientific atheist" or science based atheist rather than using the term agnostic-atheist.
__________________
And on we walked. Suddenly we heard a voice crying, "This is the sea. This is the deep sea. This is the vast and mighty sea." And when we reached the voice it was a man whose back was turned to the sea, and at his ear he held a shell, listening to its murmur.
And my soul said, "Let us pass on. He is the realist, who turns his back on the whole he cannot grasp, and busies himself with a fragment."
—Gibran Khalil Gibran, “The Greater Sea.”
Vinterland is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 08:50 PM   #103 (permalink)
Vinterland
Senior Member
 
Vinterland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 320
Vinterland is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by romansh View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinterland View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by romansh View Post
It's like godlovesyou telling you Satanists are bad in some way without finding out what Satanism means to you. I just personally objected to Vinterland telling me I was mistaken and really was an atheist.

...according to his weak atheist definition he's probably is right, but it's just not me.
all the best
It's not only my definition but that of millions of other atheists and theists. The only reason I can see for "agnostics" avoiding being associated with atheism is because of the negative response to strong-atheists who preach against religion and use illogic to base their claims on. They are generealised as simply 'atheists.' Your feeling is understandable, but seems rather dishonest.
There seem to be a group missing there in who chooses the definitions. I would also argue that the majority of theists and atheists would use the fence sitting definition. An example that comes to mind is an Australian atheists forum that have an issue with fence sitting agnostics. We should have a poll of the atheists agnostics and theists of how they define agnostic. Plus my definition is consistent with George's definition in his definition of an agnostic thread, and he owns this site!

So if this is dishonest ..... I'm being open and honest about it

Plus my Oxford dictionary and most others use this definition
I understand your appeal to authority, however would you care to actually exmaine my statements about theism and atheism not being defined by conviction?
__________________
And on we walked. Suddenly we heard a voice crying, "This is the sea. This is the deep sea. This is the vast and mighty sea." And when we reached the voice it was a man whose back was turned to the sea, and at his ear he held a shell, listening to its murmur.
And my soul said, "Let us pass on. He is the realist, who turns his back on the whole he cannot grasp, and busies himself with a fragment."
—Gibran Khalil Gibran, “The Greater Sea.”
Vinterland is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 08:59 PM   #104 (permalink)
romansh
Senior Member
 
romansh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: BC Canada, near the US border
Posts: 1,800
romansh is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinterland View Post
I understand your appeal to authority, however would you care to actually exmaine my statements about theism and atheism not being defined by conviction?
I don't disagree with your definitions...... it's just that I don't find them adequate (too broad). I agree according to your definition I am an atheist. But according to common use of the word (agnostic) I am an agnostic ..... do you agree?

Can you remind of your definition of agnostic please?
__________________
There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened. ........... Douglas Adams
romansh is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 09:11 PM   #105 (permalink)
Vinterland
Senior Member
 
Vinterland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 320
Vinterland is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by romansh View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinterland View Post
I understand your appeal to authority, however would you care to actually exmaine my statements about theism and atheism not being defined by conviction?
I don't disagree with your definitions...... it's just that I don't find them adequate (too broad). I agree according to your definition I am an atheist. But according to common use of the word (agnostic) I am an agnostic ..... do you agree?

Can you remind of your definition of agnostic please?
How is this too broad: "I don't believe in God" (Atheist)
"I believe God does not exist" (Atheist) ?

These two definition differ from the other I wrongly stated of "lack of belief in God" because that one allows every plant, tree and animal to be classified as an atheist. Saying "I don't believe in God" requires conscious recognition of the God-concept before an opinion is made.

I do agree with the common usage of agnostic, you are agnostic. I simply disagree with the commonly used term based on comparisions to theism and atheism.
__________________
And on we walked. Suddenly we heard a voice crying, "This is the sea. This is the deep sea. This is the vast and mighty sea." And when we reached the voice it was a man whose back was turned to the sea, and at his ear he held a shell, listening to its murmur.
And my soul said, "Let us pass on. He is the realist, who turns his back on the whole he cannot grasp, and busies himself with a fragment."
—Gibran Khalil Gibran, “The Greater Sea.”
Vinterland is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 09:25 PM   #106 (permalink)
romansh
Senior Member
 
romansh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: BC Canada, near the US border
Posts: 1,800
romansh is on a distinguished road
Default

What would you call a person who does not disbelieve in god?

the weak atheist definition I think would include this person? And this is what makes the atheist definition too broad.

Please could you remind me of your agnostic definition.

On another topic(s) all together.... are you in a better mood and ready to share your theist's belief? Also I disagree with some of the recent posts that 'questioned your smartness'. You are far smarter than I was when I was fifteen or sixteen. But I have about 38 y head start.

thanks
__________________
There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened. ........... Douglas Adams

Last edited by romansh : 12-20-2007 at 07:28 PM.
romansh is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 01:05 AM   #107 (permalink)
MAYBE
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 169
MAYBE is on a distinguished road
Default

I am not an atheist because not believing in God is just silly and illogical



amen friend
MAYBE is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2007, 10:26 PM   #108 (permalink)
Vinterland
Senior Member
 
Vinterland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 320
Vinterland is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

[quote=romansh;21734]What would you call a person who does not disbelieve in god?
Theist.
the weak atheist definition I think would include this person? And this is what makes the atheist definition too broad.
?
Please could you remind me of your agnostic definition.
I sumed it up in this post: http://www.agnosticforums.com/21729-post102.html
On another topic(s) all together.... are you in a better mood and ready to share your theist's belief? Also I disagree with some of the recent posts that 'questioned your smartness'. You are far smarter than I was when I was fifteen or sixteen. But I have about 38 y head start.

thanks

Speaking with Og has made me realise that my undogmatic attempts to define God are useless, so I am questioning why I am a theist and not an atheist. I think each generation becomes more knowledgeable at younger ages with all the information available. My cousins are 10 and 9 years old and a whole lot more intelligent than I was at there age.
__________________
And on we walked. Suddenly we heard a voice crying, "This is the sea. This is the deep sea. This is the vast and mighty sea." And when we reached the voice it was a man whose back was turned to the sea, and at his ear he held a shell, listening to its murmur.
And my soul said, "Let us pass on. He is the realist, who turns his back on the whole he cannot grasp, and busies himself with a fragment."
—Gibran Khalil Gibran, “The Greater Sea.”
Vinterland is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 12:24 AM   #109 (permalink)
romansh
Senior Member
 
romansh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: BC Canada, near the US border
Posts: 1,800
romansh is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinterland View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by romansh View Post
What would you call a person who does not disbelieve in god?
Theist.
So that would make someone who uses the the 'common use' definition of an agnostic both an atheist and a theist?

Quote:
Speaking with Og has made me realise that my undogmatic attempts to define God are useless, so I am questioning why I am a theist and not an atheist.
have you ruled out a deistic god ..... you know a god of the dead beat kind?
It is this kind of god as an agnostic, I personally cannot rule out?
__________________
There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened. ........... Douglas Adams
romansh is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2007, 11:58 AM   #110 (permalink)
Vinterland
Senior Member
 
Vinterland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 320
Vinterland is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by romansh View Post
So that would make someone who uses the the 'common use' definition of an agnostic both an atheist and a theist?
Disbelieve as in discredit. The agnostic atheist discredits theism based on lacking evidence to its' claims. Therefore, one who does not disbelieve, believes, right?

Quote:
have you ruled out a deistic god ..... you know a god of the dead beat kind?
It is this kind of god as an agnostic, I personally cannot rule out?
Imo (and I am not certain of this), it is not agnostic to rule out the possibility of any God. I have not ruled out the literal or non-literal Christian representations of God in Bible despite the former having made seversal testable claims (such as the flood which should have mixed dinosaurs and humans within the same strata, and so forth) that have failed, there still exists the possibility of its existence.
__________________
And on we walked. Suddenly we heard a voice crying, "This is the sea. This is the deep sea. This is the vast and mighty sea." And when we reached the voice it was a man whose back was turned to the sea, and at his ear he held a shell, listening to its murmur.
And my soul said, "Let us pass on. He is the realist, who turns his back on the whole he cannot grasp, and busies himself with a fragment."
—Gibran Khalil Gibran, “The Greater Sea.”
Vinterland is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Atheist in Congress! The An-Jel Politics, Morality, and Laws 30 02-15-2008 07:25 PM
Greetings from a former atheist trufbetold Introductions & Greetings 53 12-16-2007 02:38 AM
Hello! Former Atheist now Agnostic. Jehanne Introductions & Greetings 322 06-28-2007 12:54 AM
Once Again I Was Confused With an Atheist George Definitions 7 02-02-2007 10:22 AM
Atheist section? Fire Legion AgnosticForums.com 11 01-28-2007 04:53 PM


» User Settings
User Name:

Password:

Remember Me?
» Quick Register
User Name:


Password:


Confirm Password


Email


Confirm Email


Check to Agree with forum rules

» Sponsored Links

» Links We Love
Tactical Gun Forums

NiceComeback.com

myspacelayouts

Coupons Codes & Bargains

Deaths In Iraq


Take AF With You
Feed Icon   RSS  RSS-1   RSS-2 XML  JS


» Sponsored Links


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright © 2006 - 2007 The Jibber Network. All Rights Reserved.