Agnostic Forums
  Show Threads  Show Posts

Agnostic Forums - Discuss Agnosticism

Go Back   Agnostic Forums > Religion - Theism & Atheism, Agnosticism, Philosophy, Science > Definitions

Definitions What do you mean by: Agnostic, God, Religion, Faith, etc?



Want These Ads To Go Away? Become A Premium Member. Click here to see how...

Reply
Bookmark this thread at ThreadSoup: BookMark This Thread On ThreadSoup.com! Add it!
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-10-2007, 07:21 PM   #81 (permalink)
Vinterland
Senior Member
 
Vinterland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 320
Vinterland is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamBlue View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirArthur View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gettin' In Tune View Post
Doesn't morality exist outside of god? Why does god have to be worshiped?
Actually no, it doesn't. There was the need for religions on the formation of Civilizations, keep in mind that religions founded civilization and not the other way around. Turns easier for a bunch of pre-historic persons to understand they have to act within several social rules (main pillar of civilizations) or will have to face God's wrath than to try to explain it rationally.

After all this millenniums we can however start to question if religion is still needed. And if so, under what circumstances.
Morality came way before religion, even apes have a moral code they live by, it helps keep the tribe together and breeding.
Are those morals objective?
__________________
And on we walked. Suddenly we heard a voice crying, "This is the sea. This is the deep sea. This is the vast and mighty sea." And when we reached the voice it was a man whose back was turned to the sea, and at his ear he held a shell, listening to its murmur.
And my soul said, "Let us pass on. He is the realist, who turns his back on the whole he cannot grasp, and busies himself with a fragment."
—Gibran Khalil Gibran, “The Greater Sea.”
Vinterland is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 07:35 PM   #82 (permalink)
SirArthur
Senior Member
 
SirArthur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 229
SirArthur is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinterland View Post

Are those morals objective?
No moral can be objective, morality is a subjective thing and will ever be. However it needs to create a moral pattern in order to create and sustain a society and as bigger the society as complex those codes gets.
SirArthur is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 07:38 PM   #83 (permalink)
SirArthur
Senior Member
 
SirArthur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 229
SirArthur is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamBlue View Post
Morality came way before religion, even apes have a moral code they live by, it helps keep the tribe together and breeding.
Apes have interactivity, all right, but not morality. They live between a status of anarchy or under a dominant male who sets the boundaries. But to have "moral" they would need a conscience.
SirArthur is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 07:44 PM   #84 (permalink)
WilliamBlue
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 373
WilliamBlue is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinterland View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamBlue View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirArthur View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gettin' In Tune View Post
Doesn't morality exist outside of god? Why does god have to be worshiped?
Actually no, it doesn't. There was the need for religions on the formation of Civilizations, keep in mind that religions founded civilization and not the other way around. Turns easier for a bunch of pre-historic persons to understand they have to act within several social rules (main pillar of civilizations) or will have to face God's wrath than to try to explain it rationally.

After all this millenniums we can however start to question if religion is still needed. And if so, under what circumstances.
Morality came way before religion, even apes have a moral code they live by, it helps keep the tribe together and breeding.
Are those morals objective?
There objective is to keep a viable breeding population and area to live in and many of these are precursors to the 10 commandments* all of which help keep the peace so you can continue breeding. Religion appeared after we had the extra time to organize, if you are too busy trying to feed yourself then there is no time for such organizations. Unfortunately man grew up in (ape like)tribes, thus if you were not part of the tribe their morales did not apply to you, unless someone in the tribe saw some value in you and let you in, otherwise you would probably be run off or killed which still applies today.

*Most religions have a list of rules and most are pretty much the same, are you telling me they came up with the same lists even though they were isolated from each other?
__________________
When you dance with an elephant it's up to you to not get stepped on.
How can we be so arrogant and egotistical to believe that the whole Universe was created just for us?
WilliamBlue is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 07:59 PM   #85 (permalink)
SirArthur
Senior Member
 
SirArthur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 229
SirArthur is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamBlue View Post
*Most religions have a list of rules and most are pretty much the same, are you telling me they came up with the same lists even though they were isolated from each other?
Sorry, that only occur on three religions which at same time started to preach on behalf of the weak and the poor and for which yet no answer has been found.
It happened about 300 b.C. on Judaism by Isaiah, on Buddhism by Siddhartha Gautama (Buddha) and on Taoism by Tao Te Ching (Laozi). Turns out how 3 preachers, one on Babylonia, other at India and other at China started to preach over the same morality at nearly the same time without any contact between them.
SirArthur is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 08:01 PM   #86 (permalink)
WilliamBlue
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 373
WilliamBlue is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SirArthur View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamBlue View Post
Morality came way before religion, even apes have a moral code they live by, it helps keep the tribe together and breeding.
Apes have interactivity, all right, but not morality. They live between a status of anarchy or under a dominant male who sets the boundaries. But to have "moral" they would need a conscience.
What is a conscience but a part of your brain telling you that you are doing the right thing or the wrong thing. You believe that it is impossible for apes to have this part of the brain? We still live with a dominate person as our leader but even as apes if the leader is not doing what is good for the tribe they will threw him out, morals are a part of our heredity and so is a conscience. It is a tribe mentality and it should be obvious (to me it is).
__________________
When you dance with an elephant it's up to you to not get stepped on.
How can we be so arrogant and egotistical to believe that the whole Universe was created just for us?
WilliamBlue is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 08:05 PM   #87 (permalink)
WilliamBlue
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 373
WilliamBlue is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SirArthur View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamBlue View Post
*Most religions have a list of rules and most are pretty much the same, are you telling me they came up with the same lists even though they were isolated from each other?
Sorry, that only occur on three religions which at same time started to preach on behalf of the weak and the poor and for which yet no answer has been found.
It happened about 300 b.C. on Judaism by Isaiah, on Buddhism by Siddhartha Gautama (Buddha) and on Taoism by Tao Te Ching (Laozi). Turns out how 3 preachers, one on Babylonia, other at India and other at China started to preach over the same morality at nearly the same time without any contact between them.
Don't buy it as these maybe the major ones, but if you look a tribes that exist as separate from the rest of the world they too have a set of moralities that closely follow these major ones, you can not have peace without rules, thus the rules came first otherwise we would only have had tribes of one.
__________________
When you dance with an elephant it's up to you to not get stepped on.
How can we be so arrogant and egotistical to believe that the whole Universe was created just for us?
WilliamBlue is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 08:17 PM   #88 (permalink)
SirArthur
Senior Member
 
SirArthur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 229
SirArthur is on a distinguished road
Default

No, not at all. Many tribes and even civilizations had different sets of morality. Eg. the Spartans kill all deficient and weak people. The Japanese can commit suicide under the order of the Xogum or other land lord.
Many other civilizations and tribes were totally merciless.

Despite clans and tribes were all family. Wasn't moral which unites them. Morality is needed when more than one family started to belong to the same tribe and in order to do so, moral rules have to move to the next level.
SirArthur is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 08:21 PM   #89 (permalink)
WilliamBlue
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 373
WilliamBlue is on a distinguished road
Default

They are learning how to prove that morals evolved and eventually they will prove it. Unless you think that we are special animals and not part of the earth fauna, our millions of years of history has everything to do with the way we act, these things do not pop out of thin air.

http://discovermagazine.com/2000/feb/featmorals/
__________________
When you dance with an elephant it's up to you to not get stepped on.
How can we be so arrogant and egotistical to believe that the whole Universe was created just for us?
WilliamBlue is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2007, 08:30 PM   #90 (permalink)
WilliamBlue
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 373
WilliamBlue is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SirArthur View Post
No, not at all. Many tribes and even civilizations had different sets of morality. Eg. the Spartans kill all deficient and weak people. The Japanese can commit suicide under the order of the Xogum or other land lord.
Many other civilizations and tribes were totally merciless.
Because they did not see these people as part of their tribe and thus they were not subject to their moral code.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SirArthur View Post
Despite clans and tribes were all family. Wasn't moral which unites them. Morality is needed when more than one family started to belong to the same tribe and in order to do so, moral rules have to move to the next level.
This is not true as inbreeding would of lead to a weaker tribe, apes do allow for new members from different tribes and I do not agree that you need two tribes to have morals, morals started in the tribe. I think we are going nowhere so I will agree to disagree.
__________________
When you dance with an elephant it's up to you to not get stepped on.
How can we be so arrogant and egotistical to believe that the whole Universe was created just for us?
WilliamBlue is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Deism vs. Agnosticism Gettin' In Tune Definitions 70 07-25-2008 04:48 AM
Belief a CHOICE? rstrats Holy Texts & Dogma 77 11-26-2007 09:36 AM
Your belief on Morals granpa Politics, Morality, and Laws 11 11-07-2007 12:32 PM
Speaking your belief kevinheap Politics, Morality, and Laws 13 08-22-2007 09:17 AM
Belief vs. Faith vs. Ideas lauraclay Ideology, Theology, & Mythology 5 03-24-2007 07:51 PM


» User Settings
User Name:

Password:

Remember Me?
» Quick Register
User Name:


Password:


Confirm Password


Email


Confirm Email


Check to Agree with forum rules

» Sponsored Links

» Links We Love
Tactical Gun Forums

NiceComeback.com

myspacelayouts

Coupons Codes & Bargains

Deaths In Iraq


Take AF With You
Feed Icon   RSS  RSS-1   RSS-2 XML  JS


» Sponsored Links


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright © 2006 - 2007 The Jibber Network. All Rights Reserved.