Agnostic Forums
  Show Threads  Show Posts

Agnostic Forums - Discuss Agnosticism

Go Back   Agnostic Forums > General Discussions > Philosophy

Philosophy Discussion geared towards general philosophical and logical topics. NEW!!


ThirtySpace.com
Want These Ads To Go Away? Become A Premium Member. Click here to see how...

Reply
Bookmark this thread at ThreadSoup: BookMark This Thread On ThreadSoup.com! Add it!
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-11-2007, 03:33 PM   #61 (permalink)
Og
Campbellite

 
Og's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 2,392
Og has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond repute
Default

unrealistic in what sense? I know that we don't know much about early earth. My point is that you say that it's unlikely that amino acids spontaneously form. Yet this experiment shows exactly a case where they do. Are you saying that the M-U experiment illustrates the ONLY conditions under which amino acids are formed? It certainly isn't. There are many clouds of interstellar gas containing amino acids.

Quote:
The probability of the formation of only one protein molecule is "1 in 10300".
What does this mean? I know of many self assembled polymers. The DNA/RNA bases, for example, will self assemble into pairs when they are put together due to matching polar groups between the complimentary bases. These bases are demonstrated to exist outside of earth in interstellar clouds as well as on earth. When placed in solution, they bond spontaneously.

Are you speaking about the probability of a peptide bond occurring? In what environment are you basing this probability? The probability is clearly MUCH higher than what you state inside a ribosome where proteins are made in our bodies... And ribosomes are self assembled chains of nucleotides that form a superstructure that increases the chance that peptide bonds will form between amino acids....

So under what conditions are you stating your probability? What is your reference for the probability of the peptide bond occurring and under what chemical environment are you making your claim about a probability of occurrence?
__________________
Vi veri veniversum vivus vici. (By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe)
The self is not a fixed entity but a dynamic process of relationships
You & I, no distinction. - Tat Tvam Asi
Become Who You Are
Og is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2007, 11:46 PM   #62 (permalink)
The An-Jel
Anti-Hero

 
The An-Jel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,382
The An-Jel has much to be proud ofThe An-Jel has much to be proud ofThe An-Jel has much to be proud ofThe An-Jel has much to be proud of
Default

You know what the fun is here? We are about 80 years or so into technology that scientists can start really proving things and 5000 years of mythology is fighting it. Envy you here almost Og except in the field your going into... I'm more interested in keeping us the way we are and expanding the mind the way it is.
__________________
"And let there be Light!" said the Blind man.

Life is simple, people make it complicated - Basilisk

Nulli Expugnabilis Hosti - Royal Gibraltar Regiment
The An-Jel is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2007, 11:43 AM   #63 (permalink)
Og
Campbellite

 
Og's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 2,392
Og has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond repute
Default

What do you mean "keeping us the way we are," An-jel? And not all of mythology is fighting it... It's really only about 1500 years of mythology. Most of the older religions of the world are the ones that produced the new crazy religions. Hinduism and buddhism contain the same elementary ideas as christianity, it has just been intellectually interpreted instead of crazy literalist/supernaturally interpreted. And they're much older than the hebrews and such.

The true religions are not in conflict with science.. They realize the symbols as symbols and intellectually interpret the elementary ideas.

Thick headed literalist mythological ignorance with a global pulpit is a relatively recent player on the scene where mythologies of man are concerned. If anything, science has been busting out of this 1500 year crap for about 400-600 years (renaissance and such). So it's really only been a small window in human history (starting with the rise of the western creed religions such as christianity) that has produced thick headed crazy literalists.
__________________
Vi veri veniversum vivus vici. (By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe)
The self is not a fixed entity but a dynamic process of relationships
You & I, no distinction. - Tat Tvam Asi
Become Who You Are
Og is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 02:15 PM   #64 (permalink)
sisterX
Senior Member
 
sisterX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 625
sisterX is a glorious beacon of lightsisterX is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Hi Og, Ok I will tell you why it was unrealistic although I'm sure you already know it!
The whole purpose of Miller's experiment was to prove that amino acids could form on their own in early earth-like conditions, right?

Miller created an unrealistic simulation of the atmosphere of early earth. Early earth was very hot at those times, and that it was composed of melted nickel and iron. Therefore, the chemical atmosphere of that time should have been formed mostly of nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and water vapour. But Miller used methane and ammonia instead because knew that Amino acids CANNOT be synthesized withou ammonia.


You say that these conditions were "similar" to conditions on early early earth. But I really cant see any similarity can you point out the similarity?
The artificial atmosphere created by Miller in his experiment actually have not the slightest resemblance to the primitive atmosphere on earth.

Another point is that there was enough oxygen in the atmosphere at that time to destroy all the amino acids when they were thought to have been formed. Miller overlooked this fact, this is why he did not use oxygen at all in the experiment.
If he had used oxygen in the experiment, methane would have decomposed into carbon dioxide and water, and ammonia into nitrogen and water.
Also, without oxygen, there is no ozone layer on earth, what would then happen to those ammino acids? They would have been destroyed.

When the amino acids were formed Miller used mechanism called a "cold trap," to isolate the amino acids from the environment as soon as they were formed. If he did not, the conditions in the environment in which the amino acids were formed would immediately have destroyed these molecules.
This mechanism of isolation did not exist in an uncontrolled enviroment such as early earth.

Finally, Miller's experiment produced right-handed amino acids and cannot function in the composition of living organisms.

As a scientist how can you disregard all of these points? That is why I said you are a materialist first and scientist second. And you cannot say you are not a materialist because you believe only in material existance.
__________________
"But as for me (I believe) that He is Allah, my Lord, and I shall associate none as partner with my Lord." Surah Al-Kahf verse 38. Holy Quran
sisterX is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2007, 02:41 PM   #65 (permalink)
sisterX
Senior Member
 
sisterX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 625
sisterX is a glorious beacon of lightsisterX is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Og View Post

Are you speaking about the probability of a peptide bond occurring? In what environment are you basing this probability? The probability is clearly MUCH higher than what you state inside a ribosome where proteins are made in our bodies... And ribosomes are self assembled chains of nucleotides that form a superstructure that increases the chance that peptide bonds will form between amino acids....
I'm not talking about proteins being made in our bodies, I'm talking about abiogenesis. I dont see how you could confuse the two.

Quote:
So under what conditions are you stating your probability? What is your reference for the probability of the peptide bond occurring
I'm talking about the probability of the formation of left-handed amino acid and the formation of a peptide bond between these amino acids.

Quote:
and under what chemical environment are you making your claim about a probability of occurrence?
The enviroment of early earth with a chemical atmosphere consisting of CO2, N2 AND H2O.
__________________
"But as for me (I believe) that He is Allah, my Lord, and I shall associate none as partner with my Lord." Surah Al-Kahf verse 38. Holy Quran
sisterX is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2007, 02:56 PM   #66 (permalink)
}SoC{Sumguy
Senior Member
 
}SoC{Sumguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 259
}SoC{Sumguy is a splendid one to behold}SoC{Sumguy is a splendid one to behold}SoC{Sumguy is a splendid one to behold
Default

i think this thread may have veered slightly away from the original topic...
__________________
"And now you've seen his face,
and you know that there's a place
in the sun, for all that you've done.
For you and your children.
You always wanted to beleive.
Just ask and you'll receive,
beyond your wildest dreams.
And you already know how this will end...."
}SoC{Sumguy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2007, 03:37 PM   #67 (permalink)
lauraclay
Senior Member
 
lauraclay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 712
lauraclay is on a distinguished road
Default

Find a thread that hasn't.
__________________
The purpose of a fish trap is to catch fish,
and when the fish are caught, the trap is forgotten.

The purpose of a rabbit snare is to catch rabbits.
When the rabbits are caught, the snare is forgotten.

The purpose of words is to convey ideas.
When the ideas are grasped, the words are forgotten.

Where can I find a man who has forgotten words?
He is the one I would like to talk to.
--Chuang Tzu
lauraclay is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


» User Settings
User Name:

Password:

Remember Me?
» Quick Register
User Name:


Password:


Confirm Password


Email


Confirm Email


Check to Agree with forum rules

» Sponsored Links

» Links We Love
HD Wallpapers

PC Tech Forums

Myspace Layouts

Coupons Codes & Bargains

Deaths In Iraq


Take AF With You
Feed Icon   RSS  RSS-1   RSS-2 XML  JS


» Sponsored Links


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright © 2006 - 2007 The Jibber Network. All Rights Reserved.