| Ideology, Theology, & Mythology Arguments for and against certain ideological stances regarding or regardless of their literal/factual validity. |
Want These Ads To Go Away? Become A Premium Member. Click here to see how...
Bookmark this thread at ThreadSoup:
Add it! |
04-11-2007, 02:05 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Anti-Hero
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,518
| To be honest with you Dirge I haven't been in your situation physically but morally yes many more times than I can count. I don't know if it feels the same but the results becomes clear only after moments having delivered the resulting philosophic blow (so to speak mind you.) Everything still poses a question for me but my relevence to the organic and inorganic relation to things. If I can get my first book published I talk about this in vague detail as it relates to fiction.
Best way to approach religion these days from an objective perspective for me at least.
__________________ "And let there be Light!" said the Blind man.
Life is simple, people make it complicated - Basilisk
Nulli Expugnabilis Hosti - Royal Gibraltar Regiment |
| |
04-11-2007, 04:16 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: South Africa
Posts: 80
| When a computer does an action, it does not “care” or “want” to stay alive. It is simply following code. It does not “care” if it dies or not. |
| |
04-11-2007, 05:12 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
| | Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Israel
Posts: 20
| ya
I think that even in a state of artificial intellegence, there will never be artificial emotions, how can you program a computer to care?
sounds way way out there.
__________________ It can't rain all the time |
| |
04-11-2007, 06:17 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Campbellite
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 2,926
| Quote: |
When a computer does an action, it does not “care” or “want” to stay alive. It is simply following code. It does not “care” if it dies or not.
| Aye. But if you had many computers behaving over billions of years, the ones that "cared if they died" would take steps to avoid it, survive, and propagate. Thus creating more computers that cared if they died and handing down their genes and memes (social ideas).
As for programming a computer to care, it's a matter of giving it an objective sense of self and then defining that self to include others and then giving it a sense of self preservation.
See isaac asimov's laws of robotics:
1) Through action or inaction a human may not come to harm
2) Obey the orders of a human (except when interfering with 1)
3) Self preservation (except when interfering with 1 or 2)
This creates a robot that identifies self with humanity (i.e. self is defined in law 3 but is linked to the welfare of humanity).
Through Asimov's most famous sci-fi series (the foundation novels), his humaniform robot follows these rules and compassionately directs all of humanity towards a safer future.
__________________ Vi veri veniversum vivus vici. (By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe)
The self is not a fixed entity but a dynamic process of relationships You & I, no distinction. - Tat Tvam Asi
Become Who You Are |
| |
04-11-2007, 10:02 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 712
| Perhaps that is what we need. A force that can not break our morals to 'guide' us. Humans will always eventually corrupt. Is it better to give that up? Over the years, have we truly improved? I think we have, however slowly, and would hate to give up our independence.
__________________ The purpose of a fish trap is to catch fish,
and when the fish are caught, the trap is forgotten.
The purpose of a rabbit snare is to catch rabbits.
When the rabbits are caught, the snare is forgotten.
The purpose of words is to convey ideas.
When the ideas are grasped, the words are forgotten.
Where can I find a man who has forgotten words?
He is the one I would like to talk to. --Chuang Tzu |
| |
04-11-2007, 10:41 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,226
| Have you ever read I, Robot?
In one of the stories (the one parodied in the movie) the robots try to destroy humankind in the name of saving it from itself. LC's right on when she says we always corrupt, even ourselves.
About programming a computer to care:
You can't program emotions in a computer any more than you can in a person. You can't just point and say 'care' and have someone care about whatever you pointed to (crappy analogy I know). The point is, people have to interact with their environment to develop feelings, and computers are the same way. Like og said, if you could get them to evaluate the environment, to have a sense of self-preservation, then maybe you would be on your way to A.I.
__________________ Μολὼν Λαβέ Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate |
| |
04-11-2007, 12:15 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: South Africa
Posts: 80
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Og Aye. But if you had many computers behaving over billions of years, the ones that "cared if they died" would take steps to avoid it, survive, and propagate. Thus creating more computers that cared if they died and handing down their genes and memes (social ideas).
As for programming a computer to care, it's a matter of giving it an objective sense of self and then defining that self to include others and then giving it a sense of self preservation.
See isaac asimov's laws of robotics:
1) Through action or inaction a human may not come to harm
2) Obey the orders of a human (except when interfering with 1)
3) Self preservation (except when interfering with 1 or 2)
This creates a robot that identifies self with humanity (i.e. self is defined in law 3 but is linked to the welfare of humanity).
Through Asimov's most famous sci-fi series (the foundation novels), his humaniform robot follows these rules and compassionately directs all of humanity towards a safer future. | Even if the robot does do all these things properly, does it care? Isn't it still following code, just on a more complex level? |
| |
04-11-2007, 12:37 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
| | Campbellite
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 2,926
| Quote: |
Isn't it still following code, just on a more complex level?
| I'd say: "as are we"
__________________ Vi veri veniversum vivus vici. (By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe)
The self is not a fixed entity but a dynamic process of relationships You & I, no distinction. - Tat Tvam Asi
Become Who You Are |
| |
04-11-2007, 12:40 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: South Africa
Posts: 80
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Og I'd say: "as are we" | But to say it "cares" requires it to feel. If it does not care, the action is dead. |
| |
04-11-2007, 12:50 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
| | Campbellite
Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 2,926
| What does it mean to feel then, if these robots don't.
__________________ Vi veri veniversum vivus vici. (By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe)
The self is not a fixed entity but a dynamic process of relationships You & I, no distinction. - Tat Tvam Asi
Become Who You Are |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |