| Philosophy Discussion geared towards general philosophical and logical topics. NEW!! |
Want These Ads To Go Away? Become A Premium Member. Click here to see how...
Bookmark this thread at ThreadSoup:
Add it! |
01-15-2008, 09:25 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 320
| An agnostic reason to bea vegetarian. As an atheist I used to believe this was purely an atheistic reason to be a vegetarian, but later I realised it is true both atheism and theism (typically Deist folk who tend to not make as many illogical claims as other theists). Since it deals with knowledge of God and reality I think agnostic is the most apt term because it is encompasses theism and atheism.
The purpose is to discuss with other agnostic vegetarians their reasons for being vegetarian.
---------
My reason
The agnostic tends to not discern evidence that justifies belief inan all powerful entity that gives objective meaning and morals to humans and should not assume that humans are objectively better or more worthy than animals. This agnostic realises that a dog or cow eating and farting is equally a great an 'acheivement' as Beethoven's 9th and than any value placed in any entity is subjective inas much as they know. Because of this, some atheists and theists place their personal value in human and other animal life, but try to make them as equal as possible.
Because of my natural bias, I always place greater value in those closest to me and that includes animals.
The initial reason that made me a vegetarian was simply because I hate to see suffering or to know somethign has suffered because of me, directly or indirectly. Unfortunately I still drink milk, I just love a tall cold glass of fresh milk squeezed from a large unnattractive mammal. Milkshakes are the best, chocolate milkshakes, strawberry milkshakes, strawberry chocolate milkshakes...mmm. |
| |
01-15-2008, 10:22 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Texas
Posts: 294
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinterland Unfortunately I still drink milk | Doesn't that in some way contribute to the suffering of cows on the whole? |
| |
01-15-2008, 10:47 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 320
| Yes to the cows at the farm a few towns a way because that's where our milk comes from. I am in the process of cutting down my milk consumption but as I said; I really like the taste of natural milk so I haven't not completely made the transformation. Cutting back on meat was also a tedious process. I enjoyed meat very much as well and it took me three months to be able to resits cravings. It's all a process; if most people jump right into it it will not work for them. |
| |
01-15-2008, 10:57 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 293
| the way i see it, animals eat us, so what's bad about eating animals?
and last time i checked, milking is a natural process for mammals.
__________________ "for there is nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so."- Hamlet |
| |
01-15-2008, 11:01 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 320
| Quote:
Originally Posted by greywolf90 the way i see it, animals eat us, so what's bad about eating animals?
and last time i checked, milking is a natural process for mammals. | Other animals are not known to be able to make the conscious decision to eat alternatives to meat. A lion killing a human or other animal is justified because it requires it to nourish itself whereas many humans can sustain a very healthy diet without meat.
My problem with milking is that cows are almost always forced to be give birth to calfs so that they continue to produce milk. This is not healthy for them and this is why I want to stop consuming dairy priducts soon.
__________________ And on we walked. Suddenly we heard a voice crying, "This is the sea. This is the deep sea. This is the vast and mighty sea." And when we reached the voice it was a man whose back was turned to the sea, and at his ear he held a shell, listening to its murmur.
And my soul said, "Let us pass on. He is the realist, who turns his back on the whole he cannot grasp, and busies himself with a fragment."
—Gibran Khalil Gibran, “The Greater Sea.” |
| |
01-15-2008, 11:54 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 293
| many species of bears are omnivors and can live exclusively on meat or plants depending on whichever is availuable. i'll agree that they do not possess the same reasoning as a human, and we can choose because we have the luxery of eating whatever we want. but if it was a matter of survival, you would have to take whatever you could get. i don't see anything wrong with being a veggie, but i think eating meat is biological and not immoral. do you define eggs as meat?
__________________ "for there is nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so."- Hamlet |
| |
01-15-2008, 11:56 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: BC Canada, near the US border
Posts: 1,278
| As an agnostic:
I am convinced by the evidence that we are omnivorous.
I could be convinced that we have no free will.
Life is red in tooth and claw
Enjoy
ps Does one only eat vegetables that have died naturally and fruits that have fallen?
__________________ There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened. ........... Douglas Adams |
| |
01-16-2008, 12:09 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 320
| Quote:
Originally Posted by greywolf90 many species of bears are omnivors and can live exclusively on meat or plants depending on whichever is availuable. i'll agree that they do not possess the same reasoning as a human, and we can choose because we have the luxery of eating whatever we want. but if it was a matter of survival, you would have to take whatever you could get. i don't see anything wrong with being a veggie, but i think eating meat is biological and not immoral. do you define eggs as meat? | In a matter of survival, absolutely, IMO. Humans and animals in general have a biological predisposition to rape, but does that make it immoral? It makes it neither as much as I know. Yu're missing entirely the point of the discussion; as a science based person we cannot say if something is absolutely moral or immoral; only God can.
I'm not saying eating meat is immoral at all. Quote:
Originally Posted by romansh As an agnostic:
I am convinced by the evidence that we are omnivorous. | As am I. Humans require high levels of Omega 3 and 6 oils to be healthy which evidences that early humans had a diet based around sea animals. Quote: |
ps Does one only eat vegetables that have died naturally and fruits that have fallen?
| Irrelevant; vegetables do not think or feel emotions that we animals do.
__________________ And on we walked. Suddenly we heard a voice crying, "This is the sea. This is the deep sea. This is the vast and mighty sea." And when we reached the voice it was a man whose back was turned to the sea, and at his ear he held a shell, listening to its murmur.
And my soul said, "Let us pass on. He is the realist, who turns his back on the whole he cannot grasp, and busies himself with a fragment."
—Gibran Khalil Gibran, “The Greater Sea.” |
| |
01-16-2008, 12:21 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: BC Canada, near the US border
Posts: 1,278
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinterland Irrelevant; vegetables do not think or feel emotions that we animals do. | To all intents and purposes I agree with you.
I'm not all that familiar with this but Jainism seems goes one step further..
there is, incidently, evidence when plant life is attacked by a predator it will release chemical "messages" to neighbouring related plants...... so we are still in an grey area
I don't mean to cramp your Calorie (kilojoule) input ...... 
__________________ There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened. ........... Douglas Adams |
| |
01-16-2008, 12:27 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 320
| Quote:
Originally Posted by romansh Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinterland Irrelevant; vegetables do not think or feel emotions that we animals do. | To all intents and purposes I agree with you.
I'm not all that familiar with this but Jainism seems goes one step further..
there is, incidently, evidence when plant life is attacked by a predator it will release chemical "messages" to neighbouring related plants...... so we are still in an grey area
I don't mean to cramp your Calorie (kilojoule) input ......  | I'm reading abut it now...I don't see how it is logical to avoid eating living plants. Living organism, check; feels 'pain' as a defense mechanism, check; feels other emotions such as happiness, sadness, anger, etc, negative. Finally, they do not think.
__________________ And on we walked. Suddenly we heard a voice crying, "This is the sea. This is the deep sea. This is the vast and mighty sea." And when we reached the voice it was a man whose back was turned to the sea, and at his ear he held a shell, listening to its murmur.
And my soul said, "Let us pass on. He is the realist, who turns his back on the whole he cannot grasp, and busies himself with a fragment."
—Gibran Khalil Gibran, “The Greater Sea.” |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |