Agnostic Forums
  Show Threads  Show Posts

Agnostic Forums - Discuss Agnosticism

Go Back   Agnostic Forums > Theism -> Agnosticism - > Atheism > Morality and Laws

Morality and Laws A discussion concerning traditional moral rules drawn from religion and the laws imposed within society.


ThirtySpace.com
Want These Ads To Go Away? Become A Premium Member. Click here to see how...

Reply
Bookmark this thread at ThreadSoup: BookMark This Thread On ThreadSoup.com! Add it!
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-08-2008, 02:22 PM   #31 (permalink)
shadowind
Senior Member
 
shadowind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 345
shadowind is on a distinguished road
Default

who is the authority in morals?
__________________
remember "for mere impulse of appetite is slavery, while obedience to a law which we prescirbe to oursleves is liberty"-rousseau: the concept of the general will "if we can not reconcile all opions, then let us endeavour to unite all hearts."-?"to be is to be perceived"-? "‘We can be as honest as we are ignorant. If we are, when asked what is beyond the horizon of the known, we must say that we do not know’-Robert G. Ingersoll
shadowind is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 02:28 PM   #32 (permalink)
shadowind
Senior Member
 
shadowind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 345
shadowind is on a distinguished road
Default

or what standard is the most usefull. There might be an absoulte truth, but we're seperated from it, we apear to be limited and held back by a reference point.

if we have a system or a standard to judge the "correctness" of something, 2+2 for example(which could be said to be an "instance" of the system) and the system judges 2+2=4 as correct, what means do we have to judge the correctness of the mathamatical system or class that defines the rules. we have other standards and systems, but that simply leads around in a circle. system/standard judgeing standard on into infinity.
__________________
remember "for mere impulse of appetite is slavery, while obedience to a law which we prescirbe to oursleves is liberty"-rousseau: the concept of the general will "if we can not reconcile all opions, then let us endeavour to unite all hearts."-?"to be is to be perceived"-? "‘We can be as honest as we are ignorant. If we are, when asked what is beyond the horizon of the known, we must say that we do not know’-Robert G. Ingersoll
shadowind is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 04:24 PM   #33 (permalink)
GX
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Male, Chicago Illinois, USA
Posts: 307
GX is on a distinguished road
Default To absolute

Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowind View Post
or what standard is the most usefull. There might be an absoulte truth, but we're seperated from it, we apear to be limited and held back by a reference point.

if we have a system or a standard to judge the "correctness" of something, 2+2 for example(which could be said to be an "instance" of the system) and the system judges 2+2=4 as correct, what means do we have to judge the correctness of the mathamatical system or class that defines the rules. we have other standards and systems, but that simply leads around in a circle. system/standard judgeing standard on into infinity.
I am with shadowind on this one. Its easy to say 2+2=4 and not 5 because there is a system of physical absolutes to base it on. What do you base absolute morals on? God? If so, how did God communicate this to you? I can already point out a contradiction even before you answer:
1) Muslim societies claim that its Gods will to cut the hand off a thief
2) Christian societies claim that its Gods will to forgive the thief

Both claim absolute morality from God.
Go figure...

Conclusion: Morals are relative, subjective and ever changing not only from place to place but from generation to generation. Most importantly, morals are a human construct, not something handed down from God.
GX is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2008, 02:15 PM   #34 (permalink)
B-continum
Junior Member
 
B-continum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 12
B-continum is on a distinguished road
Default

There was nothing wrong with the proof for 'absolute truth'. However, the only absolute truths are to be found in mathematics. If you come back to the issue at hand, morality, you can't say that because morality is a human construct. The ideas of good and bad are subjective values that humans give to things and issues. Seeing as morality is based on what is good and what is bad, morality is also subjective.

And before the absolute truth bit is brought up again, answer this: what is truth? Is it good, bad or morally neutral?
__________________
"If you want to make God laugh, tell him your future plans" - Woody Allen

"I have too much respect for the idea of God to make it responsible for such an absurd world." - Georges Duhamel

"What does an agnostic, dyslexic insomniac do? Stays up all night and wonders if there is a dog." -Unknown
B-continum is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 07:50 AM   #35 (permalink)
dameedna
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 78
dameedna is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TSR View Post
I would say no it isn't a human invention, nor do I believe it's the result of some explosion. (Some explosion="big bang" for those who like to have things put in more complex terms for the sake of it) And there are things that are absolute of course, 2+2=4 every time, if I do it a million times over, its result is absolutely four, etc.

Actually, this is not technically true.

2 Raindrops + 2 Raindrops does not = 4 Rain-drops

It equals 1 raindrop!!!

As to their being absolutes, at this point wether there are or aren't I don't think we have them figured out yet.

But we still need to make decisions, so we have to create a moral and ethical code for society that we stand by, regardless of wether it's perfect. I think it is important to alway's be open to changing ones mind, if new information becomes available.

Beyond a set of Moral or Ethical Codes, I think it's important to devise a way of reaching a decision, a philispohical or ethical system that enables us to reach what we think is the best decision possible with what we know.

People desire certainty, which unfortunately no matter what people believe, I don't think we will ever have. Maybe less certainty and more thinking about our behaviour is the way to go
dameedna is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 07:53 AM   #36 (permalink)
dameedna
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 78
dameedna is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowind View Post
who is the authority in morals?
Historically, it appears that the authority comes from those that "win the war" and wipe out those that don't agree.

Good thing heretics like myself can no longer be put to death or sent into exile.
dameedna is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-13-2008, 02:20 PM   #37 (permalink)
shadowind
Senior Member
 
shadowind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 345
shadowind is on a distinguished road
Default

good thing indeed.
__________________
remember "for mere impulse of appetite is slavery, while obedience to a law which we prescirbe to oursleves is liberty"-rousseau: the concept of the general will "if we can not reconcile all opions, then let us endeavour to unite all hearts."-?"to be is to be perceived"-? "‘We can be as honest as we are ignorant. If we are, when asked what is beyond the horizon of the known, we must say that we do not know’-Robert G. Ingersoll
shadowind is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2008, 02:42 AM   #38 (permalink)
NotConvinced
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 306
NotConvinced is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to NotConvinced
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dameedna View Post
Actually, this is not technically true.

2 Raindrops + 2 Raindrops does not = 4 Rain-drops

It equals 1 raindrop!!!
Excellent example, I'm definately gonna use that somewhere, thank you.
__________________
<insert meaning of life here>
NotConvinced is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2008, 09:21 AM   #39 (permalink)
AB517
Senior Member
 
AB517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 798
AB517 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NotConvinced View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dameedna View Post
Actually, this is not technically true.

2 Raindrops + 2 Raindrops does not = 4 Rain-drops

It equals 1 raindrop!!!
Excellent example, I'm definately gonna use that somewhere, thank you.
ahh that song is wrong.

it should be

"a rain drop keeps falling on my head ..."
"
AB517 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2008, 03:17 AM   #40 (permalink)
dameedna
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 78
dameedna is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NotConvinced View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by dameedna View Post
Actually, this is not technically true.

2 Raindrops + 2 Raindrops does not = 4 Rain-drops

It equals 1 raindrop!!!
Excellent example, I'm definately gonna use that somewhere, thank you.
sigh..I'd love to take credit for clever things, but this isn't mine.

It was in a book I read, After athiesm, by Mark Vernon.
dameedna is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Origin of Morality Skepticologist Morality and Laws 36 03-19-2008 10:19 PM
Does God exist? A slice of personal philosophy.... GI Philosophy 36 03-14-2008 05:33 AM
Morality vs. Religion LadyLuck What is an Agnostic? 55 06-12-2007 12:27 AM
Is there Morality in the "Holy" Roman Empire? blast_1 Morality and Laws 3 05-29-2007 09:24 PM
How about Morality/Laws? scpitcher AgnosticForums.com 3 09-21-2006 09:13 PM


» User Settings
User Name:

Password:

Remember Me?
» Quick Register
User Name:


Password:


Confirm Password


Email


Confirm Email


Check to Agree with forum rules

» Sponsored Links

» Links We Love
HD Wallpapers

PC Tech Forums

Myspace Layouts

Coupons Codes & Bargains

Deaths In Iraq


Take AF With You
Feed Icon   RSS  RSS-1   RSS-2 XML  JS


» Sponsored Links


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright © 2006 - 2007 The Jibber Network. All Rights Reserved.