08boi

A Freind Sent Me This And Im Trying To Find The Holes....I'm Having A Hard Time Though

PROOF AND REASONS THAT GOD EXISTS

1)Modal ontological argument

A)God is either necessary or unnecessary
B)God is not unnecessary, therefore he must be necessary
C)Therefore, GOD EXISTS

2)Argument from creation vs. evolution

A)Evolution can't be true, since I lack the mental capacity to understand it
B)Plus for me to accept its truth would make me uncomfortable
C)If evolution is false, then creationism must be true
D)Therefore, GOD EXISTS

3)Argument from Belief

A)If God exists, i should believe in him
B)I believe in God
C)Therefore, GOD EXISTS

4)Parental argument

A)My mommy and daddy told me God exists
B)Therefore, GOD EXISTS

5)Argument from parochialism

A)God is everywhere
B)We haven't been everywhere to prove that God does not exist
C)Therefore, GOD EXISTS

6)Argument from personal sanity

A)I've had religious experiences that can't be explained unless I'm insane or God exists
B)AND IM NOT INSANE!!!
C)Therefore, GOD EXISTS

7)Argument from lack of disproof

A)You can't prove that God doesn't exist
B)Therefore, GOD EXISTS

8)Argument from preferred ancestry

A)I don't want to be related to monkeys
B)Therefore, GOD EXISTS

9)Argument from foolishness

A)The Bible says that atheists are fools
B)I don't want to be a fool
C)Therefore, GOD EXISTS

10)Argument from bumper sticker

A)Real men love Jesus
B)God created real men
C)Therefore, GOD EXISTS

11)Argument from assumption

A)I think God exists
B)Therefore, GOD EXISTS

AB517

lol

as cute as any I seen for or against.

nakamichi680zx

Oh this should be good

Some of the arguments are completely lame and presumptive.

Really: "I think God exists, therefore God exists"

So if we kill the thinker and he stops thinking, God stops existing, yes?

What if I think God does NOT exist, doesn't my thinking counteract his thinking?

Totally presumes the reader will go along with the original premise of "If God exists". This is the same faulty arguing style that Erich von Däniken used in "Chariots of the Gods?".

1. He would start with a premise which could be a fact or not.
   
2. Then he would place an assumption based on the premise. You would be expected to agree with where and how he leads you.
   
3. He could then base an assumption off of the first assumption which itself was based on a premise (faulty or not).
   
4. He'd repeat this until he came to the conclusion that he wanted you to come to.

This is flawed reasoning and some of these same statements reflect the same flaw.

I'll let others more senior to me weigh in on this but to me this provides no proof. It just assumes you cannot think for yourself and then provides conclusions for you.

__________________
GrassHoppah: The Great Way is not difficult for those who have no preferences.

greywolf90

i think that was made by an atheist...

__________________
"for there is nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so."- Hamlet

Jasen777

They're parody arguments.

kellid

I think God exists therefore, God exists. (to me).