Quote:
Originally Posted by Astral Anyone can say that the Bible took this from that or that from this. Is it not also possible that they took those animal sacrificing from the people of God? Remember... just because the Bible was not written back in that time does not mean anything. The bible speaks of Adam and Eve, but we all know for certain it was not written at that time. But we do know they were the first based on the scriptures. It is not implausible at all that Adams and Eves descendants taught all the others to sacrifice in tribute to God. Further more it is also not implausible that they taught them nothing and Satan taught the others to sacrifice.
As you can see no one specifically owns the whole sacrificing thing so propping something up as stolen from another theology is really more or less offering up straw men and loosing red herons. |
For a discussion such as this, we need to speak on grounds of evidence. in this case, this means ancient texts and archaeological evidence:
Ancient Texts
- There are texts older than the Bible.
- As far as I know, the Bible wasn't the first text to mention animal sacrifice.
(If I'm incorrect, please quote a scholar making this claim.)
Archaeological Evidence
- The Israelites are far from the oldest culture on the planet.
- Cultures that preceded them had customs and practices very similar to later Jewish ones.
- According to a modern scientific understanding of time and causation, later events following from earlier ones are considered strong corroborating evidence of a cause and effect relationship.
Quote:
|
Now regarding the Bible and which translation is most authentic. Many scholars have done comparisons of the original scriptures with many translations and the general consensus is that the KJV is the closest.
|
This may be the general consensus of Christian scholars, but this is obviously a biased opinion. There are English translations based on earlier texts than were used for the KJV. Plus, scholarship has immensely developed since the time of that translation. It may be the only translation you're familiar with... but if you're unwilling to study other translations, its of no specific concern of ours.
I understand there are many translations out there and many of them are not that good. Its difficult keeping up. However, considering there are more scholarly translations than the KJV, why wouldn't you want to study those translations?