A Frog could be 25 million years old.

HomoCyclist · 02-16-2007, 07:36 PM

I find this news very interesting. How much more proof do the Creationists want to admit that Evolution science is a proven fact?

Article says:

"A Mexican researcher announced the rare find of a tiny tree frog completely preserved in amber on Wednesday that he estimates lived about 25 million years ago."

Scientist: Frog could be 25 million years old - Science - MSNBC.com

**SithLord** · 02-17-2007, 07:03 AM

Oh noes!

Accorsing to creationists the earth is only 6,000 years old.

This cannot be. Because.... well because religious eladers say so! They don't have any proof, they just say so!

Irony: Married christian women walk around with proof the earth is a lot older than 6,000 years old right on their hand. Diamonds.

**The An-Jel** · 02-17-2007, 01:33 PM

Interesting enough I was checking on the evolutionists Faith in another thread described as not believing in the whole thing. They actually have two competing scientific theories called:

Punctuated equilibrium - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

and

Modern evolutionary synthesis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I found these on this site

</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY TEXT="#000000" LINK="#0000ff" VLINK="#551a8b" ALINK="#ff0000" BGCOLOR="#00ffff"> NO EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION <P ALIGN="CENTER"

I am glad you opened this thread because I didn't feel like derailing George's thread any further any more than it already had.

Anyway: about a hundred evolutionists from the thousands out there want to say Darwinism is not correct and this gives Christians who are all set to accept the Biblical terms of Creation to unite because it appears that scientists are divided. Well some may be divided but still no actual proof of Punctuated Equilibrium can be tested and it merely deviates from Darwinism in an indistinguishable manner. As for Neo-Darwinism well the scientist that began it simply doesn't accept a certain criteria that Darwin set forth in his initial theory. So what!

Christians gather around to attack evolutionists on the weak basis that if 100 scientists deviate from the 1000s of other evolutionists they have an in to attack evolution. They can freely of course but it is up to them to prove their case OUTSIDE of just faith if they want to "redeem" the unbelievers Soul or even just to prove these people of faith are just not nuts. The proof is on them and science will just merrily chug away until the truth is known... scientifically!