Agnostic Forums
  Show Threads  Show Posts

Agnostic Forums - Discuss Agnosticism

Go Back   Agnostic Forums > Theism -> Agnosticism - > Atheism > Evolution vs Creationism

Evolution vs Creationism How did we really get here and why are we here. Do you even care?


ThirtySpace.com
Want These Ads To Go Away? Become A Premium Member. Click here to see how...

Reply
Bookmark this thread at ThreadSoup: BookMark This Thread On ThreadSoup.com! Add it!
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-25-2007, 11:36 AM   #11 (permalink)
greywolf90
Senior Member
 
greywolf90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 293
greywolf90 is on a distinguished road
Default

"i am a believing science guy"

so does this mean that you believe in evolution and intellegent design?
__________________
"for there is nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so."- Hamlet
greywolf90 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2007, 11:52 AM   #12 (permalink)
romansh
Senior Member
 
romansh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: BC Canada, near the US border
Posts: 1,264
romansh is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Wikipedia .....On the heels of this definition, that same year (1865), the most infamous version of the second law was read in a presentation at the Philosophical Society of Zurich on April 24th, in which, in the end of his presentation, Clausius concludes:

The entropy of the universe tends to a maximum.

This statement is the best-known phrasing of the second law. Moreover, owing to the general broadness of the terminology used here, e.g. universe, as well as lack of specific conditions, e.g. open, closed, or isolated, to which this statement applies, many people take this simple statement to mean that the second law of thermodynamics applies virtually to every subject imaginable. This, of course, is not true; this statement is only a simplified version of a more complex description.
Entropy is a scientist's measure of randomness.... greater the entropy greater the randomness.
other definitions given include .... these may give a better sense of the second law.

In an isolated system, a process can occur only if it increases the total entropy of the system.
Heat cannot spontaneously flow from a material at lower temperature to a material at higher temperature.
It is impossible to convert heat completely into work.

this is after two minutes research on Wiki????

regarding rotation of the planets.....by your argument... weather patterns should always spin in the same direction of earth? In practice ....opposite directions north and south of the equator....why friction and turbulence.
Similar arguments would apply in space.

If I had to invoke god everytime I did not understand something?
all the best

added
being Christmas Day ..... I googled second law of thermodynamics and god and found this. I think it fairly accurately represents the science and does it with a Christian perspective. I'd be interested in your thoughts on this article DC

Hope you are having a good Christmas.
__________________
There is a theory which states that if ever anybody discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened. ........... Douglas Adams

Last edited by romansh : 12-25-2007 at 03:32 PM.
romansh is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2007, 08:41 PM   #13 (permalink)
AB517
Senior Member
 
AB517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 763
AB517 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by greywolf90 View Post
"i am a believing science guy"

so does this mean that you believe in evolution and intellegent design?
I believe God created the Universe.
I am not shore believing is how I would describe the observations of nature.
I believe we are capable of understanding the laws of the universe.
God hides nothing from us. It is man that hides and obscures the truth.

It seems the universe is running on the laws that science observes.
AB517 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-26-2007, 08:48 AM   #14 (permalink)
Og
Campbellite

 
Og's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 2,372
Og has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond repute
Default

The notion of god as a separate actor/being on an ultimate scale is demonstrably false. That is not the way the UNIverse works.
__________________
Vi veri veniversum vivus vici. (By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe)
The self is not a fixed entity but a dynamic process of relationships
You & I, no distinction. - Tat Tvam Asi
Become Who You Are
Og is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2007, 10:32 AM   #15 (permalink)
AB517
Senior Member
 
AB517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 763
AB517 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Og View Post
The notion of god as a separate actor/being on an ultimate scale is demonstrably false. That is not the way the UNIverse works.
We disagree here.

Unless you are talking about a religious God, then I agree.

It is not demonstrably false. This is just flat out wrong.
Could you please explain what you mean?
If you know how the universe works ... your the first.
AB517 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2007, 11:23 AM   #16 (permalink)
harleylove
Senior Member
 
harleylove's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 179
harleylove is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm just curious, if you believe God created the universe but not a religious God, what are your beliefs?


Thanks
__________________
If the day and night are such that you greet them with joy, and life emits a fragrance like flowers and sweet-scented herbs--that is your success. All nature is your congratulation.
Henry David Thoreau 1817-1862
harleylove is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2007, 07:26 PM   #17 (permalink)
AB517
Senior Member
 
AB517's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 763
AB517 is on a distinguished road
Default

[quote=harleylove;22459]I'm just curious, if you believe God created the universe but not a religious God, what are your beliefs?

Wow, this is a lengthy answer. I will keep it short.

I mean that no one religion owns God.
What ever that idea would mean to you.
AB517 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2007, 07:45 PM   #18 (permalink)
greywolf90
Senior Member
 
greywolf90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 293
greywolf90 is on a distinguished road
Default

this sounds like a good way of preventing religious intolerance. i wonder how much fighting there would still be if more religious people had this type of philosophy.
__________________
"for there is nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so."- Hamlet
greywolf90 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2007, 07:45 PM   #19 (permalink)
Og
Campbellite

 
Og's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Northern, VA
Posts: 2,372
Og has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond reputeOg has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AB517 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Og View Post
The notion of god as a separate actor/being on an ultimate scale is demonstrably false. That is not the way the UNIverse works.
We disagree here.

Unless you are talking about a religious God, then I agree.

It is not demonstrably false. This is just flat out wrong.
Could you please explain what you mean?
If you know how the universe works ... your the first.
The notion of an entity with intrinsic identity is illusion. A flower is made up 100% of non flower parts. Same with a tornado and a person and a deity. All things are entirely defined by extrinsic characteristics.

Defining something with intrinsic identity is just a convention that is used as a local reference. Nothing has intrinsic identity in the universe. Thus the notion of a being (i.e. a thing with intrinsic identity) is false. Thus the notion of a god as an entity separate from you/me/the universe is false (as I said above).

This is called dependent origination. All things dependently arise from all other things. All is one. Just as weather systems come together to form a tornado, all "things" are produced by the confluence of other things ad infinitum until you see the universe as a single process.
__________________
Vi veri veniversum vivus vici. (By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe)
The self is not a fixed entity but a dynamic process of relationships
You & I, no distinction. - Tat Tvam Asi
Become Who You Are
Og is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2007, 08:07 PM   #20 (permalink)
greywolf90
Senior Member
 
greywolf90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 293
greywolf90 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Og View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by AB517 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Og View Post
The notion of god as a separate actor/being on an ultimate scale is demonstrably false. That is not the way the UNIverse works.
We disagree here.

Unless you are talking about a religious God, then I agree.

It is not demonstrably false. This is just flat out wrong.
Could you please explain what you mean?
If you know how the universe works ... your the first.
The notion of an entity with intrinsic identity is illusion. A flower is made up 100% of non flower parts. Same with a tornado and a person and a deity. All things are entirely defined by extrinsic characteristics.

Defining something with intrinsic identity is just a convention that is used as a local reference. Nothing has intrinsic identity in the universe. Thus the notion of a being (i.e. a thing with intrinsic identity) is false. Thus the notion of a god as an entity separate from you/me/the universe is false (as I said above).

This is called dependent origination. All things dependently arise from all other things. All is one. Just as weather systems come together to form a tornado, all "things" are produced by the confluence of other things ad infinitum until you see the universe as a single process.
when you talk about god, i am going to assume that by "god," you are meaning the source that everything came from. so my question is how can something be called the "origin" if it was made of something else?

i'd also like to point out that i don't see god as something physical, such as a flower or a tornado. i see god as more of a human concept, such as good and evil. i don't think evil is exactly "made" of other things.
__________________
"for there is nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so."- Hamlet
greywolf90 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Evolution Og Evolution vs Creationism 34 06-04-2008 11:49 PM
Evolution of Man - From Child to What? George Evolution vs Creationism 9 06-02-2008 09:15 AM
The end of evolution Bodhitharta Evolution vs Creationism 33 07-31-2007 09:58 AM
No Evolution Piglet Evolution vs Creationism 25 06-01-2007 12:14 PM
Buddha on evolution... niranjan Evolution vs Creationism 1 05-28-2007 08:00 PM


» User Settings
User Name:

Password:

Remember Me?
» Quick Register
User Name:


Password:


Confirm Password


Email


Confirm Email


Check to Agree with forum rules

» Sponsored Links

» Links We Love
HD Wallpapers

PC Tech Forums

Myspace Layouts

Coupons Codes & Bargains

Deaths In Iraq


Take AF With You
Feed Icon   RSS  RSS-1   RSS-2 XML  JS


» Sponsored Links


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Copyright © 2006 - 2007 The Jibber Network. All Rights Reserved.