Quote:
Originally Posted by shaun Quote:
Originally Posted by Astreja The Bible is a mixture of plagiarized Akkadian and Canaanite mythology, | Can you prove this for us? |
Easily done. The story of Noah is actually the story of
Atrahasis from Babylonian mythology. And
Elohim is derived from the Canaanite chief god El.
Quote:
Quote: |
mistranslations from Hebrew/Aramaic to Greek,
| Can you prove this for us?
|
The Hebrew word
almah, as presented in Isaiah 7:14, simply means "young, unmarried woman". It's dishonest to translate it strictly as "virgin", yet that's what happened in the Septuagint, where the word appeared as
parthenos and spawned the myth of the Virgin Birth. (I, Myself, suspect the translators were attempting to butt in on Athena's territory by using a word commonly used as Her epithet.)
Quote:
| Can you prove this for us?
|
No geological record of a worldwide flood, but plenty of historical records from civilizations that carried on with business as usual right through the purported time of said flood.
No solar eclipse or earthquake recorded in the vicinity of Jerusalem around the alleged time of the crucifixion of Jesus.
No archeological evidence for Israelites wandering around for forty years on the Sinai Peninsula. I mean, come
on, now. That many people, travelling in a small geographical area for such a long time, should've left a rather substantial number of artifacts in their wake.
And don't get Me started on the sheer absurdity of that many people getting
lost in an area which one can cross on foot in a couple of
weeks. A month, tops, allowing for women and children. I mean, how hard could it have been to send out scouting parties in several directions and report back with the location of suitable land for resettlement?
If indeed the Israelites were ever in Egypt at all, I suspect the "forty years in the wilderness" bit was pure fabrication. Forty
days, perhaps, which would also explain the lack of an archeological footprint.
Quote:
Quote: |
preposterous eschatological ramblings,
| Fallacy - just because it is strange to you does not make it necessarily false.
|
I call foul -- This is an attempt to shift the burden of proof.
Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. If you want me to think it reasonable that a dragon can sweep one-third of the stars out of the sky, first you have to show me a real live dragon. (A horking
big dragon, with a tail about 15,000,000,000 light years long.) Until you do that, I am under no obligation to take Revelations seriously.
Quote:
Quote: |
and some very, very, very bad tribal laws.
| What's "bad"? What laws? What do you consider "good" tribal laws?
|
Forcing a woman to marry the man who raped her is
bad. (Deuteronomy 21:11-13 and 22:28-29).
Stoning wizards (Leviticus 20:27), disobedient children (Deuteronomy 21:18) or people who work on the Sabbath (Numbers 15:32-56) is
bad.
Forbidding handicapped individuals from performing religious services is
bad. (Leviticus 21:16-23)
On the other hand, Leviticus 19 has a few good things: Leave some fruit on the vine for travellers to eat; pay your workers promptly; don't lie; don't steal; don't gossip. A lot of good stuff in the book of Proverbs, too.
And Isaiah 1 has "Cease to do evil; learn to do well; seek judgement, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow / Come now, and let us reason together..."
Ultimately, a good law improves lives and a bad law destroys them. Simple as that.