| Science & Philosophy Is science our new world religion? What is science uncovering about our world and how is this impacting society? Arguments about the fundamental nature of reality. |
Want These Ads To Go Away? Become A Premium Member. Click here to see how...
Bookmark this thread at ThreadSoup:
Add it! |
01-06-2008, 03:35 PM
|
#91 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 147
| Quote:
Originally Posted by romansh Quote:
Originally Posted by Astral Quote:
Originally Posted by romansh By your logic evolution would create/has created religion god and the like.
Thank you, you did enlighten me | If evolution is true, then I believe that is the case. If evolution is true then no God(s) exist but the ones we imagine. | actually both our arguments are non sequitur | With some variance, yes. Anyone can take a theory and modify it to explain for some discrepancies. But I think for the most part our conclusions do not fall in that category. |
| |
01-08-2008, 06:32 PM
|
#92 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,118
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Og Quote:
Originally Posted by Astral When I coin the term intellectual dishonesty, I mean it to imply that they contradict themselves with another tenet they say they believe in. I will provide an example.
Evolution and Socialism. This one is common. Evolution is directly the survival of the fittest. Socialism is generally about taking care of everyone. If we take care of everyone we allow the genetic pool to more easily corrupt itself by keeping bad genetic code alive long enough to reproduce. What happens if we corrupt it so much that we weed out all the good genes and are left with nothing but bad genes? How is humanity to survive having shot itself in the head?
If you believe in evolution then you must allow people to perish because they are not fit. And if you believe in Socialism then all effort should be made to save those that are not fit. | This is not the way evolution works. It does not extract genes that kill the organism. In fact MANY genes are compromises that allow the creature to replicate but kill it after it has done so. Cancers are many kinds of genes that are susceptible to mutation but provide important localization and proliferation queues during the life of the organism. They won't get selected out because they only effect the organism AFTER it has passed the gene on. It doesn't matter what the organism believes in as far as political ideology is concerned.
Evolution does not have a will. If working together and supporting a group of people enhances the fitness (ability to reproduce) of members of that gene pool then that is what will be selected for. They may genetically run themselves into a corner over time, but evolution allows for that.
Evolution has nothing to do with killing those who are not fit. It has to do with factors that enhance reproduction and survivability. NO concept can be "against evolution" as you put it. Evolution just happens. Some creatures survive to reproduce for some reasons. It has nothing to do with the will of the creatures towards survival.
Socialism could be a very useful way to control a population such that it could survive in harsh environments. There is nothing counter to evolution about group sharing/cooperation behaviors. In fact it is senseless for one to say that there is a behavior in nature that is "counter to evolution." Evolution has no will or direction or goal. It simply describes the process of change that occurs in creatures over time. | almost correct
Kind of like a radio sayin to itself. I am a collection of parts and the music comes from within me. |
| |
01-30-2008, 07:40 AM
|
#93 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 60
| Astreja,
re: “Until you do that, I am under no obligation to take Revelations seriously.”
Any particular reason for adding an “s” at the end of Revelation? |
| |
01-30-2008, 11:37 PM
|
#94 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Winnipeg, Canada
Posts: 432
| Quote:
Originally Posted by rstrats Any particular reason for adding an “s” at the end of Revelation? | Just a typo. I've heard people refer to it as "the book of Revelations" and that's how it came out when I typed it. |
| |
02-27-2008, 10:33 AM
|
#95 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Poland - Mikołów
Posts: 88
| Quote:
The house or apartment building you live in was designed and built by an intelligent life form
The television you watch was designed and built by an intelligent life form
However, the universe and planet you live in and the body you have which are millions of times more complex than anything I’ve listed above were created by random assembly and a process known as evolution
A laughable assumption really and is the best trick the devil has ever pulled
| Yeah, yeah, by all means believe in what you like. You & I may believe that we're rejects of higher civilization here on earth.
One problem with this kind of thinking is invoking bigger complexity than the one you're trying to explain. Then you should ask a question who created God who must be obviously more complex than what he allegedly had created.
Infinite regression is what you get
__________________ It is a capital mistake to theorise before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts - Sherlock Holmes |
| |
02-29-2008, 07:02 AM
|
#96 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 70
| The Creation myth is just philisophical allegory as are 'The Fall', 'The Exodus', 'The Gospels' etc. Anyone studying ancient mythology, egyptology, ancient pagan/mystical religions will be clearly aware of this.
To my mind; Darwin evolution to a minor degree has taken place on species (never created a different animal - fruit flies are still fruit flies!), classes of animals are distinct and originated from one ancestor i.e wolf for now domestic dog. 'Blue prints' of species I believe were delivered to this planet (space dust) as natural law within the cosmos. We have always been human on this planet and have just basically become more 'civilised' from hunters/gatherers. Alot of our insticts are evolved from the thousands of years we spent as hunters/gatherers (evolutionary pyschology). Neo-Darwinism does not account for DNA and the laws and general fitness of the universe. Both the Bible and biology do NOT provide the answers to origins.
__________________ The more you know, the more you realize you don't know, the less you know the more you THINK you know. |
| |
03-01-2008, 02:09 PM
|
#97 (permalink)
| | Premium Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 387
| Quote:
Originally Posted by GI To my mind; Darwin evolution to a minor degree has taken place on species (never created a different animal - fruit flies are still fruit flies!), classes of animals are distinct and originated from one ancestor i.e wolf for now domestic dog. 'Blue prints' of species I believe were delivered to this planet (space dust) as natural law within the cosmos. | You didn't watch the short movie I posted earlier did you, or you did and choose to ignore the evidence there in? So you are a believer of intelligent design, I am guessing?
__________________ When you dance with an elephant it's up to you to not get stepped on.
How can we be so arrogant and egotistical to believe that the whole Universe was created just for us? |
| |
03-01-2008, 04:48 PM
|
#98 (permalink)
| | Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,118
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomasz Quote:
The house or apartment building you live in was designed and built by an intelligent life form
The television you watch was designed and built by an intelligent life form
However, the universe and planet you live in and the body you have which are millions of times more complex than anything I’ve listed above were created by random assembly and a process known as evolution
A laughable assumption really and is the best trick the devil has ever pulled
| Yeah, yeah, by all means believe in what you like. You & I may believe that we're rejects of higher civilization here on earth.
One problem with this kind of thinking is invoking bigger complexity than the one you're trying to explain. Then you should ask a question who created God who must be obviously more complex than what he allegedly had created.
Infinite regression is what you get | Irrelevant to us in this universe.
The only question is where we came from? |
| |
03-02-2008, 08:56 PM
|
#99 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Collyfawnia ver Ahnold iss our Goverminator
Posts: 39
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Astral Quote:
Originally Posted by romansh By your logic evolution would create/has created religion god and the like.
Thank you, you did enlighten me | If evolution is true, then I believe that is the case. If evolution is true then no God(s) exist but the ones we imagine. | For the support of God being imagined, ask the question "Why won't God heal amputees?"
This is a fascinating seemingly simple question that this site explores.
I'll cut to the article's key point (but you need to read the entire article for context: Quote: Key Point
If God is imaginary, then he does not answer any prayers. Therefore, the prayers of amputees would go unanswered too. The thing that is so appealing about this explanation is that there is no hand waving. There are no contradictions. It is completely fair. There is no paradox. This explanation makes sense in light of the evidence we see in our world.
|
__________________ GrassHoppah: The Great Way is not difficult for those who have no preferences. |
| |
03-25-2008, 11:07 AM
|
#100 (permalink)
| | Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 87
| Quote:
Originally Posted by MAYBE The computer you’re typing at was designed and built by an intelligent life form
The car you drive was designed and built by an intelligent life form
The house or apartment building you live in was designed and built by an intelligent life form
The television you watch was designed and built by an intelligent life form
However, the universe and planet you live in and the body you have which are millions of times more complex than anything I’ve listed above were created by random assembly and a process known as evolution
A laughable assumption really and is the best trick the devil has ever pulled
Amen friend | And you call yourself an inteligent life form.  Think about what you are saying.
All of those things you have listed (that are not " millions of times more complex than anything I’ve listed above ") are things that have EVOLVED. ya know, like over time and stuff.
__________________ You can do it your own way, long as its done just how I say.~the hypocrit |
| | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | | |