Quote:
Originally Posted by Piglet  Armel P
And those conclusions are based on 4 decades of rational observation.
+ Many many thousands of work read. [some really good stories]
By a being society says is in the .05% top range, Mr smart guy. [but not really]
Yet it all brings me closer to my ignorance. [is that T S Eliot?]
There can be no 'proof of athiesm'
And any religion that has hell in it is false.
What is left Armel ?
Biding time
Piglet
PS. could you email me the symbol?
I'd like to see it. nemesis@westnet.com.au |
I have to be honest, I can't tell if you are disagreeing with me. But I will say that the logical thinking involved dates back much farther than four decades. It just was not as fashionable as it came to be in the twentieth century. I think there has been an intelligentsia, of small percentage as usual, for hundred of years that understood or would have understood these ideas and it is because of these people that he have such a grasp of the ideas now.
As for the symbol, well I can't do that yet. The symbol is highly dependent on the essay I might write on agnosticism. But this essay will also serve as a learning process for me and I may change my views as a write it. So we'll see. I may even decide that having a symbol is too childish or even that it somehow undermines the ideas. I've always hated symbology and numerology. It is nice and tasteful though.