Originally Posted by Og

If you cannot see (and by this I mean any sensory experience or thought) or explain something, then what could possibly lead you to accept it? That's the million dollar question I guess. Why take a stance on it at all if you cannot see or explain something? How do you even have the first clue that your stance will be correct? I prefer informed stances instead of a stance for the sake of having a stance. Even more crucially, I prefer to let my stances be led by evidence and to not identify (i.e. "take") my stances with me.