Agnostic Forums - View Single Post

jimmy77611 · 05-12-2008, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abel

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmy77611

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abel

On your third error you referenced Noah bringing in two of every creature. Noah was not commanded to bring in two of every creature, but two of each "sort" of animal: Genesis 6:19 "And of every living thing of all flesh, two of every sort shalt thou bring into the ark, to keep them alive with thee; they shall be male and female." This means, for example, two dogs. Not two Great Danes, two bull dogs ...etc. Just two dogs.

So, all of the different species of monkeys, dogs, cats, lizards, snakes, horses, pigs, etc, etc. all evolved from one single "sort" of these animals brought onto the ark 4000 years ago, and all migrated all over the world from mt. ararat, scaling the oceans to do so?

Of couse you'll say "God probably placed them all over the earth", which would be an assumption on your part (one you have made before in other posts), with not even biblcal evidence to support such a stance.

If you believe this, then you are definitely in denial of reality.

Since you don't believe in evolution, I want to know your explanation of how the many different species of monkeys came from one single species within the last 4000 years.

Very simple. Selective breeding. This is seen today with dogs, cats, even horses. You breed a hairy monkey with another hairy monkey, you get a hairier monkey. You find this hard to believe, yet you believe monkeys came from some tadpole looking creature. Now tell me who is in denial of reality.

OK, so along this line of resoning, if there were ONE "sort" of monkey only, as the bible says, how could there have been selective breeding? Where did the hairy monkey find the different hairy monkey to breed with, thus creating the hairier monkey?

Where in any of my previous posts did I indicate that I believe monkeys came from a "tadpole looking creature" ? You make a lot of assumptions I've noticed.