Quote:
|
So you are absolutely certain that the uncertainty principle holds? This is another blatant contradiction that simply can’t be taken with any seriousness.
|
Nope. I said that I know through repeatable observation (read: I have evidence illustrating) that this is the case. That's all anyone can ever have. But things like nuclear particle emissions are inherently deterministic. A purely stochastic emission of a photon could give someone cancer and kill them when they would have otherwise gone on to change society. The reality of examples like this forces one to discard hard determinism.
If you want to start stating that you experience absolute truth via third eye wisdom, then we're certainly not talking about the same thing. Transcendent knowledge is formless and is not based on categories of thought (i.e. being and non-being). It can't even be spoken about or conceived. I understand what you're getting at here, but this does NOT have anything to do with causality being absolute.
The universe is not deterministic. Deterministic universe is a disproven hypothesis. A=A does not, in any way, prove that absolute truth exists. It simply says that things seem to have form and we can give them labels.