View Single Post
Old 05-06-2008, 06:29 PM   #103 (permalink)
pseudonous
Senior Member
 
pseudonous's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 374
pseudonous is on a distinguished road
Default

Remster,

I have a question about the wording you used for theory 2.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Remster View Post
Theory 2. Newton's theory combined with the theory that some powerful though otherwise undetectable being makes it seem to us that very large and very small objects behave in anti-Newtonian ways.
When you say a powerful being makes it seem that objects behave in an anti-Newtonian way, what exactly are you trying to say? I'm having a hard time imagining this. If, for instance, the anti-Newtonian theory says that lead can be turned into gold, how would a being make lead only appear to be gold? After all, if the metal was shiny like gold had the density, the conductivity, melting point, etc.. of gold then it would be gold. Or, if the anti-Newtonian theory suggested we could build some dark matter engine to send spaceships to other solar systems how could this merely be an illusion? Wouldn't this being have to, in fact, be causing objects to behave in an anti-Newtonian way rather than just giving the illusion that they behave in an anti-Newtonian way?
__________________
"One is most dishonest to one's god: he is not allowed to sin." - Nietzsche
pseudonous is offline   Reply With Quote