Originally Posted by shadowind

back for a little,
if its fundamental it is probally consistant, and can be treated as an absolute truth but due to our limitations i don't think we'll be able to know. we're an instrument that effects the outcome of the result in a not-completly knowen way. we're part of the system we're trying to measure, we're using our ability to measure to judge our ability to measure right? isn't that a circular argument?