back for a little,
if its fundamental it is probally consistant, and can be treated as an absolute truth but due to our limitations i don't think we'll be able to know. we're an instrument that effects the outcome of the result in a not-completly knowen way. we're part of the system we're trying to measure, we're using our ability to measure to judge our ability to measure right? isn't that a circular argument?
__________________  remember "for mere impulse of appetite is slavery, while obedience to a law which we prescirbe to oursleves is liberty"-rousseau: the concept of the general will "if we can not reconcile all opions, then let us endeavour to unite all hearts."-?"to be is to be perceived"-? "‘We can be as honest as we are ignorant. If we are, when asked what is beyond the horizon of the known, we must say that we do not know’-Robert G. Ingersoll |