Nick Treklis

There's an uncountable number of causes that contributed to that particular photon emission. The fact that the one photon was previously formed together with the rest of that element in the past, that fact the sun didn't explode incinerating the entire solar system, the fact that another galaxy didn't turn into a giant monster and eat up our galaxy, and of course the fact that that photon is in fact that photon and not anything else in the universe. Indeed everything else in the universe besides that photon is a past cause to it's current state of being. Even the photons past state of being is a cause of its present state of being. Just because the photon is emitted in a way that we can't observe a billiard ball type chain reaction causing it does not mean it wasn't caused.

Absolutely. That equipment is designed the observe the universe in one particular way which leaves out all the other numerous ways in which the universe could potentially be viewed. It's the same way our bodies have evolved to only allow so much information to be picked up by our sense, such as sound, sight, touch, taste, and scent. The Totality can not be viewed in its entirety, in fact it can't be viewed at all. It's objectively formless, all we can do is view infinitely small pieces of it with our senses and the equipment we invent, and even then that equipment only relays the information back to us in a way that our senses can perceive it. Part of being a conscious being means we are inherently limited when viewing the physical universe. If we were constantly being bombarded with an infinite amount of information in infinitely small increments of time for eternity we would not be conscious. One would need a mind that was essentially Nature itself, but as you can see this is logically impossible.

I stopped banging my head a while ago. There are many things I am absolutely certain of as you should be able to tell from my respones in our discussion.

For most sciences there is not a direct public demand for them in every day life. Many sciences require government subsidies for the continued existence. Think about the cult of man made global warming. These scientists are running in circles trying to prove that man is causing the warming of our planet when in fact Earth has gone through many warming and cooling periods. And the thing is, the carbon cycle follows suit with the climate, not the other way around. Any scientist that disagrees with the man made global warming theory is ostracized and considering a loony, but the real motivation for this behavior is that their institutions and continued research rely on the special interest dictated government money that is given to them for the specific purpose of proving the man made global warming theory true. To this day they have done nothing of the sort.

And like I said, all of this quantum measurement is done at the sub atomic, i.e quantum level, hence the label Quantum Mechanics.

What this shows is that people are taking quantum mechanics and trying to apply it on a universal level which will always lead to illogical conclusions such as an object being two different objects simultaneously. Like I said earlier, just because we can't currently observe a billiard ball type chain reaction going on doesn't mean there aren't causes, such as the examples I provided. Quantum theory ought to remain in it's particular scientific niche otherwise it begins to lose its meaning.

A, which can be substituted with any phenomena will always equal A in any scenario based on what the observer is currently witnessing. It is a logical impossibility for it to be otherwise. Although if you think you have a legitimate example I'd love to hear it. FYI Shroedinger's cat is not a legitimate example. As I've already logically proved it isn't the result of a logical proof demonstrated through quantum mechanics, but a result of quantum mechanics being streched beyond its limits into areas where it can only produce illogical and incoherent conclusions.

So how did you achieve absolute certainty that these axioms can never be proved absolutely true? Either we accept this axiom at face value and come to terms with fact that it is absolutely true, or we recognize that it is a walking contradiction and therefore meaningless which means it is absolutely false, in turn showing us the real Absolute Truth of the matter. Any way you slice it this logically proves the existence of Absolute Truth that can be understood by us through the use of logic.