[=Og;28829][=noeticcenter;28825]
Noetic response; Charge is what you define it to be. 'Mass' is the 'charge' in the gravitational field. If you are4 asking for a 'reason' for axion chemistry, thereis none. But that is true of ordinary chemistry also. You know only the 'how' not the 'why'.
There is no reason why a force like graviton/gravitino both positive and negative cannot act for axion-like matter particles in the same way as the electric charge for ordinary matter particles.
Noetic
Huh? So you're imagining properties that have never been demonstrated? Sounds good! You have a hypothesis, now go test it!
As for a "reason" for chemistry, it's as I said. It's the sum of the quantum-electrodynamic interactions between atoms. As for a reason for the atoms in the first place, that's entirely a different story. But chemistry is well defined
____
Noetic response:
Not really! The SUSSY chemistry does not rule out an Axion Chemistry. Yoour statement: "As for a "reason" for chemistry, it's as I said. It's the sum of the quantum-electrodynamic interactions between atoms", gives the 'how' of chemistry. Interactions exist. Why? Nobody knows. The rare gases have the maximal stability meaning minimum interactions. Again why? Today QM explains 'how' that stability is reached, not why.
As regards expriments, at least the differential emission rates of biophotons acorss the taxa is established seeking an explanation. Nobody so far paid any attention to this. Some have reported 100 times more emission from plant cels per unit area than human cells. It cannot be a DNA feature since these structures are very similar across the taxa.
Noetic |