Good point. So if I consider the claims of each religion on a case by case basis, and test them for contradictions (in their bibles, prophecies, and teachings), historical inaccuracies, and utter falsities, then the uncovering of a certain religion's errors and falsehoods itself constitutes evidence that that religion is as false as the gods it purports to exist? This is a reasonable proposition. And even if we encountered a religion without any recognizable errors in its holy writings, the fact that they use discredited arguments for the existence of their God like the teleological or cosmological argument, then this in itself constitutes evidence that their God is false figment of their imagination. And since there really is no human religion which doesn't use one of these flawed arguments, I'll go ahead and administer a fatal preemptive attack on all of them
