Quote:
Originally Posted by GI  Origins of life remain unknown and extremely debatable despite the fact that the majority of scientists will tell you that it is definataly via the Darwin model because they fear the unknown and their own job! It makes no sense at all and we should really start to face up to the fact that this model of evolution doesn't explain anything more than minor modifications.
This is interesting: http://www.panspermia.org/rnaworld.htm
People blindly accept this Darwin dogma. How many of you here confuse atheism with agnosticism???? |
evolution explains the diversity of life. i'm not aware of Darwin ever saying "and life/DNA began by..." i also do not know of any scientists pretending to know how life began. this whole discussion is simply your misunderstanding of evolution. scientists accept evolution not out of fear for any alternative explaination. if the purpose of science is to find the real answers, what does science have to lose by disproving one of its theories? think about it: creationists have been trying to contradict the theory of evolution since the beginning, yet evolution remains as the foundation of biology, while creationism is considered a pseudo-science. why is that? because while evolution is supported by much evidence and lacks contradicting evidence, the notion that all life forms were created individually and seperately has evidence to contradict it. it is the creationists who fear that their religions made a mistake, that we were not more special than the rest of nature, and that their is not some divine plan for our existance; that our existance was nothing more than nature taking it's course. as for blindly accepting dogma, i did my research, read the debates, considered both arguments as equally as my personal bias could allow, and evolution won. so what makes me any different from you?