Well one can debate still regardless of reading the entire Bible. For those with a scientific mind. Have you read all the books and taken all the classes. Put them to memory? I would say no. Learning is a life long process. Each book in the bible requires dedication. Not just a breeze through it to claim one has the Bible.
My question at mind at this moment is why does it bother science so much about the Bible and its history. When nothing has been really proven about the beginning of time.
Look at carbon dating and how many times science had to revamp the whole process. I think its been atleast 2 or 3 times already. And science is suppose to be factual.
How factual is the Bible. Countries fight over the land that has been dated during the times of parts of the bible. Genetics of the Jews and the scattering of them. They believe they have found a tribe in South Africa which is to be one of the tribes of Isreal. They matched the DNA of the tribe, I believe about the total of 80 to Jews who are direct descendants of one of the tribes in Isreal. They believe there is a strong connection. Science also went out to try and prove if it was possible for Moses to split the red sea. Or where is the Noah's Ark. Still science can not disprove things in the bible as much as the bible can not disprove things of science that are base upon theory. |