Hello Nakamichi,
Quote:
|
Started my slide/shift with (of all things) Conversations with God by Neal Donald Walsh...Then came the mother/father of all Atheists, Richard Dawkins, who spoke so much common sense that my view of God, is so far reduced from what it was that I no longer have a sense of any caring or concern of this God.
|
Im familiar with both books. In CWG, Walsch claims that the God of the universe is not that dysfunctional one that the religions claims him/her/it to be. All Richard Dawkins book does is basically say how the God of religions is a dysfunctional God which is common sense (and which is also what Walsch's book says but it offers a more enlightened view of God). How did Dawkins specifically persuade you over Walsch?