Thread: Proving things.
View Single Post
Old 02-15-2008, 10:35 AM   #43 (permalink)
Herra1
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 43
Herra1 is on a distinguished road
Default Ab 517

Quote:
Originally Posted by AB517 View Post
Rom

What do you mean ˝ life is made up? I thought they decay at a given rate and we just call that rate ˝ lives. Also, what do you mean by phenomenon?

Harri,

I am with these two; I do not know now what you are looking for. I think, and I can be wrong, that you are trying to make “it” more than "it" is. The number 1 is understood for what it is and what it represents to man. The truth or depth of this understanding can be validated by the nature of its acceptance by other “smart” people. The concept and use of it would (and will) extend to any intelligent being as we understand them. We write it as “1” they mite use some other digit thingies but the understanding is the same.
I want to know.
I said i was agnostic about 1.
I wanted to know, do we know 1= one. Also, what is scientific rigour.

If we are "agnostic towards unproven things", well then, what the heck are things that are proven, even ?

There is not a thing that is proven(it seems), or have valid argument/s with true premises, other than the things/mirages that exist in our brain with certain neurons.

So, 1, is a term/description incapable of precision ?

If one, is a "figment of our imagination" from where, comes our knowledge of the world ?
From trust ?
Herra1 is offline   Reply With Quote