Marmalade, thanks. I only know what you point out about pantheism.
Quentin Smith is a naturalistic pantheist-atheist.
Ockham isn't merely the simplest but the one that itself doesn't reqire ad hoc assumptions as the god one so does and that one just fits onto natural explanations without any additional facts and cannot of itself make predictions.
Anyway , it is nonsense even to ask why is there something that is a non -question with a non-answer as the ignostic challenge so shows. Why not? How could there be nothing?
And I also apologize as depression entered my litle world.