[i]Maramalade, I mean that those brain sensations accoount for all religious experiences. To bring ins God would violate the Ockham. Now atheologian Jonathon Harrison in God, Freedom and Immortality disagrees with me and Susan Blackmore in stating that the experieinces are quasi-hallucinatory so not as " to commit onself to the view tthat they were wholly caused by the state of the percipient,, which would be to beg the the queston agaisnst the view that the quasi- hallucinations were partly caused ,by, say the Virign Mary."Now I find it otherwise as noted, and it would be question-beggig to aver that she has a role in that we know she is dead and so cannot have such a role!
Now your argument pertains to where I note that my Socratic ignorance comes to the fort. Let us further discuss your cogent argument. We make a good team, eh? My humble naturalism needs enlightment!
__________________  :: Fr.Griggs rests in his Socratic ignorance and humble naturalism. He might be wrong. And his cortical defects might harm his thinking and posting. Logic is the bane of theists.  |