The presumption of naturalism is that not only are natural causes and explanations efficient, they are also necessary, primary and sufficient. This neither sandbags theists nor begs the question, but demands evidence as Einstein adduced evidence to overcome part of Newton's laws.
The presumption shows therefore that Existence is all I show here. As the natural cosmological cause, it is the repository of all causes and explanations.
As the natural ontological argument posits there can be no god transcendent to and greater than Existence, and any god would have to be thus immanent and contingent.
As the dysteological argument shows. natural selection has no preconceived outcomes, no wanting us. Dysteological selection therefore contradicts teleological God with his planned outcome. That destroys theistic evolution. All teleological arguments- design, fine-tuning , probability and from reason- beg the question of preconceived outcomes.
Theists must adduce evidence to overcome Hume's criteria for miralcles ,including the resurrection of Yeshua or the ride of Mohammed to Heaven on a horse or any other such matter.
Theists must adduce evidence that God has favored the survival of Jewry through eons [There is this matter of the Holocaust!].
Theists must adduce evidence to show that any scriptures are divine other than mere say so.
Theists must adduce evidence to show that their religious morality has a foundation beyond the mere say so of the writers.
Theists must adduce evidence that our religious experiences are not just our own brain states.
Theists must overcome the ignostic-Ockham arguments to show that God has substanece and meaning and use.[ the other thread for comments]
Therefore, theists have plenty to adduce to show that Existence and the presumption of naturalism are not the final answers.