lets assume the universe goes on forever, and that the patterns of the planets surrounding us goes on in to the expanse forever. think about it, endless possiblilitys, somewhere the conditions will be right, and sometype of carbon based molecule and other neccassary chemicals would interact in such a way that produces a simple replicating chemical soup or something, this replicates itself inperfectly, creating different versions of itself, some versions survive or replicate faster, then evolution takes hold, and evolution is not random, its natural selection, what dies doesn't produce offspring, what lives produces offspring, that offspring lives, another mutation happens, climate then changes, making that mutation helpfull, and then we have a new species, im pretty sure we can observe natural selection, by sticking a bunch of bacterium into a culture, using a chemical to kill it,(might have to do it a few times, im not a micro-biologist) wait alittle while till a mutated baterium thats resistant to the chemical reproduces, then wal la, we have a example of natural/artifical selection, now apply that to history, and it makes perfect sense. also there artifical selection which is when we breed animals selectively according to the constraints we create, nature has constrants also, heat, predators, type of enviroment, food, and such that some mutated version of animal will be better able to survive in, surviving longer and producing more offspring. its not random. im sure theres rules and laws that has to do with the formation of planets to, it just so happened that when earth formed it was right for it all to start, its seems perfectly possible.
also intellegent design has the problem of what created god, surely something as complicated as god has to have a creator?
__________________  remember "for mere impulse of appetite is slavery, while obedience to a law which we prescirbe to oursleves is liberty"-rousseau: the concept of the general will "if we can not reconcile all opions, then let us endeavour to unite all hearts."-?"to be is to be perceived"-? "‘We can be as honest as we are ignorant. If we are, when asked what is beyond the horizon of the known, we must say that we do not know’-Robert G. Ingersoll |