Bobleplask, I'm just going to show you where you've used absolute truth to try and prove relative truth, to show you the contradictory nature of your argument.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobleplask  If something can be viewed from more than two angles, it can't be trusted as an absolute truth. |
This is an absolute truth claim.
Quote:
|
So what can be viewed from only one angle? The answer is Nothing.
|
This is an absolute truth claim.
Quote:
|
So Nothing is an absolute truth. But does that mean that nothing is true or that we just can never find it?
|
You're playing with semantics now. Sounds good, means absolutely nothing.
Quote:
|
If you take away everything you have something
|
No, if you remove everything you have nothing. Nothing is not something by definition - 0 is not 1, no matter how much you try and state it.
Quote:
|
(in this example you don't get something - you get nothing (but as a something)) that can only be viewed one way and it's impossible to be mistaken by it.
|
This is an absolute truth claim.
Quote:
|
And if you put these things into Nothing you get something - alas you can never observe it.
|
Non sequitur fallacy. It does not lead you to believe you can never observe it (again an absolute claim) by any means.
Quote:
Everything is relative - Nothing is true  |
That's an absolute truth claim you just used to say everything is relative. Your argument fails in its attempt to define itself.
Quote:
|
Not exactly the first time I've thought of this and for now I think the theory is bulletproof. Twist it please |
I think you should think again.