View Single Post
Old 12-01-2007, 03:54 AM   #33 (permalink)
renderator
Junior Member
 
renderator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Russia, Saint-Petersburg
Posts: 23
renderator is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to renderator
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by romansh View Post
what I was trying to say what you call "positive" and "negative" are a function of language ..... In Russian(?) and English theism is positive (existance) and atheism is negative (non existance) ...... but in a hypothetical language (or perhaps culture) it could be the other way round?
What are you going to disprove, if you have nothing to disprove cause no proof has been given to you.
Give me the proof of God and I will disprove it.
It does not matter what language you use.

Quote:
Originally Posted by romansh View Post
I agree I can't prove or disprove Thor or Zeus or any other theistic god .....I think theistic gods are highly unlikely.....
You have nothing to disprove, if there is no proof.
What does it mean "highly unlikely"? Does it mean that the explanation "I can't start the engine of my car because there is a dwarf settled in it" is valid for you in some cases?

Quote:
Originally Posted by romansh View Post
I have had 'a proof' explained to me regarding the impossibility of theistic gods (the proof should work for "revealed" fairies and the like aswell). I have attached the post/explanation ...see if you agree? ....
There are boundaries for Universe - time and space connected by psi-function.
The thing is that time and space are properties of our Universe and they have boundaries. Universe is ~14 billions years old and ~156 billions light years wide.

Last edited by renderator : 12-01-2007 at 06:56 AM.
renderator is offline   Reply With Quote