Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinterland  No science is not atheistic, nor should it be. Any conclusions drawn from observations do not lend credence to any particular belief or lack of. Science consists of explaining natural phenomena, |
Just a minute. Explain me please how can you make an experiment without having accepted that there is no supernatural things nearby?
For a example.
You say that a physical body, you are using in your experiment weights 5 kg. I say that "No, it weights 3kg in fact, but those extra 2kg that the scales show is the influence of a supernatural object". You tell me "No it weights 5 kg because the scales show that it weights 5kg and there is no supernatural objects around". I say "OK, prove me that it is really so and there is no supernatural objects"
But you can't! You have no methods to test it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinterland and God is something science as of now, can not explain. |
Then it is not God, because God is supernatural. It means you have no way to prove Him in any way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinterland I'd like to see the evidence you have to substantiate your claim that God is a product of the imagination. You must have something solid other than your opinion. Honestly, there isn't much of a difference between God and a Leprechaun. |
The same way. I would like to see the evidence that Leprechaun is not a product of the imagination. What's the difference?