View Single Post
Old 11-28-2007, 11:58 AM   #231 (permalink)
Sa\/en
Member
 
Sa\/en's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 74
Sa\/en is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by niranjan View Post
Wow, so , killing people in order to reduce overpopulation is right according to u.

And u consider that persons intent as just, because he feels that way!!!!


I guess serial killers may be your heroes.
Nope, but to someone else, it could be pictured as right. He/she might believe that humans are having and adverse effect on the planet, because of global warming, habitat destruction etc, etc. Therefore, to eliminate people would eliminate carbon-emissions. Someone might picture life as a whole as useless and decide to take the world out with him. You can plead all you want, he just has to say, “I don’t care if you die.’ So yeah, again, this boils down to opinion, not fact.

By the way, your response shows a lack of understanding of what I have said.

Quote:
Originally Posted by niranjan View Post
And what is the basis on which to judge whether his intent is correct or not, or is closer to the truth or not.
Exactly, now apply that reasoning with your opinion that humans are important. The truth has nothing to do with it. The truth sits by itself, what you do with it is up to you. So yeah, again, this boils down to opinion, not fact.


Quote:
Originally Posted by niranjan View Post
I have based it on discrimination, that which brings the greatest good and the least evil.
You’re evil! Why not kill 100 people and save 300 cows, huh, buddy? Because it is your opinion that humans are more important than cows. So yeah, again, this boils down to opinion, not fact.

Quote:
Originally Posted by niranjan View Post
For example, when there is ample vegetarian food around, slaughtering and killing animals is wrong in my opinion, except in some cases of animals or fish, that supplies certain required nutrients to the body that cannot be supplied by vegetarian food.
Oh no, fish are gods chosen creatures! So yeah, again, this boils down to opinion, not fact.

Quote:
Originally Posted by niranjan View Post
On the other hand, when there is no vegetarian food, and the only way to survive is through non-vegetarian food of animals or fish, then I believe that the right thing to do is to take up non-veg.
Nope, humans can starve, save the fish! You fish murdering evil bastard! So yeah, again, this boils down to opinion, not fact.

Quote:
Originally Posted by niranjan View Post
It is again pure discrimination or judgement based on the situation or circumstances by discerning the truth and putting it in action.

Intent has nothing to do with it.
Oh, your own agenda has everything to do with it! Fish are important, humans are carbon-pumping disease infested rats. So yeah, again, this boils down to opinion, not fact.

Quote:
Originally Posted by niranjan View Post
You can also say that an another basis of the 'whole' is a healthy respect for life, and holding it as precious and valuable.

Also a cow is good economics, and is a quite productive animal which is useful to human beings and the environment . Hence it indeed is valuable.
Sorry, I believe that killing cattle is immoral, go kill yourself you cattle eating Satanist! So yeah, again, this boils down to opinion, not fact.

Quote:
Originally Posted by niranjan View Post
And where have they been refuted. The only ones refuted is yours, as you have not answered mine, as I have answered yours.
Please, quote the arguments you are talking about, they don’t seem to exist anywhere. And sorry, all your arguments have been refuted, you just assume you have a point by boring the hell out of your enemy. Oh, you have answered none, that is why I am still arguing
__________________
Not a shred of evidence exists in favor of the idea that life is serious--Brendan Gill

Life is simple, people make it complicated.
Sa\/en is offline   Reply With Quote