Dear Og
you seem to like the word gibberish.
Look it up!
You seem to use tit to deflect asnd not actually directly discuss the concept at hand fully.
For example,"I do not say it lacks a beginning. I say that the notion of "Before" the beginning is gibberish" So now the universe has a beginning but the rest is gibberish. Do you believe that the universe camer from nothing? If so then this goes against what we know so far that anything created has a cause. But back to the universe. Did the universe come from nothing??
You stated,"Time dilates at a singularity." I agree with you and have stated that time and matter go together. But God, being outside time and space caused the universe. Of course he works within the universe and our time.
But to deny this outright means you know absolutly that this cannot be right and since you believe science only disproves something then you cannot disprove it.
"The phenomenon in question is known as quantum entanglement. Briefly stated, what is happening is this: Particles which are arbitrarily far apart seem to be influencing each other, even though according to relativity this means that what seems to be causing an event from one point of view, from another point of view doesn't happen until after the effect being caused."
By Fergus Ray Murray
He also stated,"In particular, quantum systems show correlations over such distances that it is very difficult to reconcile them with the picture of time painted by relativity and the picture of cause and effect with which we are all familiar from the earliest ages."
Do not be so sure you are correct about causes.
On a few occasions now you have made simialr statements to this,"Saying that "the universe must be caused" is expressing your lack of understanding of the properties of the cosmos." But you have not folowed up what the details are of the cosmos and why I am incorrect.
alexie |