I will say it again."The New testament has been assessed for errors many times and is cited as having 99.5% accuracy."
Quite good for a book written by many authors with hundreds of years between them and vastly different backgrounds.
Again I say if you reject the Bible histroy then you reject all of ancient history.
Now for some logic. If the Bible is so inaccurate and especially so after the Roman occupations or even the counciel of Nicea, then where are all these so vastly different texts? Just because one version uses the word bad and one abomination does not make it inaccurate. Have you ever used a thesaurus? You can use words in the one sentence, change them and retain the meaning too.
alexie |