A) When you present your 'opinion' on a forum like this, and then get the responses that you have (basically saying you're full of it), it is YOUR obligation-IF you want to be taken seriously, to provide supportive data. This is your debate. If you don't want to provide valid research, then you deserve everything you've gotten.
B) Googling does not count as scholarly research, it can
only if certain criteria are met (I take it you haven't completed any college research classes). If you retreived this information from EBSCO, ProQuest or any number of other search engines with the scholarly articles only checked-THEN you would be presenting valid data. Otherwise you are just repeating something you read on the internet-and there's a whole lot of BS out there.
Based on your response to me I'm willing to bet you have no scholarly peer reviewed citations behind your 'opinion'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacob  Google in "REAL Mt. SINAI". Choose a site.
I have presented my opinion, that's all I've done. I should not have been vehemently slurred for this.
Investigate on your own and make your own decision whether Ron Wyatt's discovery is the real Mt. Sinai or not.
Jacob |